Can you answer why the dyno shows a increase if there isn't going to be one on the street or track? Isn't a dyno used to show if the aftermarket add ons make a difference or not like with exhaust, pc3, or anything? From your statement my bike may be slower with the changes before the TRE even though the dyno shows a increase with the cannon and Bazzaz. I haven't been able to further street test due to the rain, but all the other dyno increases made a different on the street. I don't mind the debate but you have to back up your statement...
In reality, YES your bike may be slower with the pipe and bazzaz than when stock. If you (the rider) can't ride the bike to it's full potential, adding more power is only going to make it worse. So that statement depending how you want to look at it could be true. The dyno might show more power but if the rider can't use it, it may not be quicker/faster. Same thing if you put a lighter better rider on the 177hp bike. Your bike might dyno higher but the lighter better rider may be quicker....
Now as far as the TRE, this has been discussed a million times. The TRE is junk and a complete waste of time. A better question is how many pulls were made with and without the TRE...? Did you do more than one gear to see what the 5th gear mapping did to the other gears...? Was the leaf blower used during the tests...?
Again, there are more variables than certainties in your test, just like the last dyno session. I just feel bad your buddy spent all that money for 1.4HP when many of us told you guys the test was flawed from the beginning...
Last edited:
