- Joined
- Jun 29, 2005
- Messages
- 3,980
- Reaction score
- 3
Check this guy out... he and a group of his lackys tagged Air Force One!! Cant even imagin how many federal laws he broke doing this...
stillfree.com
stillfree.com
Dont know what to think about this guy...
- Thread starter Sloto200
- Start date
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2003
- Messages
- 15,174
- Reaction score
- 33
Hey, More power to him. If nothing else, he helped pay for the $2.8 billion dollar fuggin 747... Or his parents taxes did anyway.
Besides, security will go through the fuggin roof after this, so in a sense he's provided an important service.
Balls though... BIG FUGGIN BRASS BALLS...
Besides, security will go through the fuggin roof after this, so in a sense he's provided an important service.
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2003
- Messages
- 5,073
- Reaction score
- 318
I would have laughed my ass of if they both got capped while climbing the fence. Shouldn't have been able to happen, Rick James yell's "sekuridy"
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2003
- Messages
- 15,174
- Reaction score
- 33
Oh and as a side note, if he had tried the same thing when the The Pres was in the area? He'd have been gang Fugged at the first fence or dropped dead at the second.
Remember they are only "AirForce One" or "Marine One" when the President is on board, otherwise it's treated as another Military Air Craft. No justification for their ability to get to the plane, but they didn't actually TAG Air Force One. FWIW.
Remember they are only "AirForce One" or "Marine One" when the President is on board, otherwise it's treated as another Military Air Craft. No justification for their ability to get to the plane, but they didn't actually TAG Air Force One. FWIW.
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2003
- Messages
- 41,994
- Reaction score
- 2,666
Before watching his video explaining why he did this, I assumed he was showing just how easy it is to gain access to Air Force One...that was scary enough...
But, does anyone else think he's asking for the best of both worlds here? He wants free speech and the right to do grafitti, yet doesn't condone illegal activities?
His disclaimer: Marc Ecko Enterprises does not condone illegal activity, acts of vandalism, or the destruction of other people's property. We do, however, advocate freedom of expression, graffiti as a recognized art form and the protection of consumer rights regardless of age, race, religion or political affiliation.
Can't have it both ways...you're either doing something illegal, or you are not...does he want cities across America to put up walls JUST FOR this type of activity?
WTF?? Go buy yourself some damn canvas...am I missing the point here?
But, does anyone else think he's asking for the best of both worlds here? He wants free speech and the right to do grafitti, yet doesn't condone illegal activities?
His disclaimer: Marc Ecko Enterprises does not condone illegal activity, acts of vandalism, or the destruction of other people's property. We do, however, advocate freedom of expression, graffiti as a recognized art form and the protection of consumer rights regardless of age, race, religion or political affiliation.
Can't have it both ways...you're either doing something illegal, or you are not...does he want cities across America to put up walls JUST FOR this type of activity?
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2003
- Messages
- 15,174
- Reaction score
- 33
Yeah, Quality Fuggin Air Force "Security Forces" at work right there. Yep I allways slept better knowing they were "Patrolling the Perimeter". Poor Bastards though, SF is NOT an AFSC that most folks actually want, it's very much like Air Force infantry and their job is to stare at that Aircraft ALL NIGHT!
drumminman
Donating Member
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2005
- Messages
- 437
- Reaction score
- 1
He didn't actually do this!!!
I saw a blurb about it on CNN last night and it's computer generated. He even has a disclaimer in the fine print on his website.
Got alot of people talking though
I saw a blurb about it on CNN last night and it's computer generated. He even has a disclaimer in the fine print on his website.
Got alot of people talking though
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2003
- Messages
- 41,994
- Reaction score
- 2,666
I didn't see that fine print, but I was kind of annoyed by the time I'd finished watching his speech anyway...He didn't actually do this!!!
I saw a blurb about it on CNN last night and it's computer generated. He even has a disclaimer in the fine print on his website.
Got alot of people talking though
Hey, I don't like that I have to wait 'til I get home to drink...I want to walk around town with beer in my hand and not be hassled by the man! And I want to drink while at work too...these pesky laws are infringing on my personal rights!!!
PLEASE!!!!
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2005
- Messages
- 7,786
- Reaction score
- 10
He's really lucky, at times with Air Force One there is a ring around it that is a KILL ZONE . You cross, You Die ! Simple !
I know someone in Security is looking for a new job or career today! That is just inexcuseable ! Expecially since AF One is suppose to have Guards around it 24/7
I know someone in Security is looking for a new job or career today! That is just inexcuseable ! Expecially since AF One is suppose to have Guards around it 24/7
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2003
- Messages
- 41,994
- Reaction score
- 2,666
Check two posts above...seems he didn't really do it! Computer generated...He's really lucky, at times with Air Force One there is a ring around it that is a KILL ZONE . You cross, You Die ! Simple !
I know someone in Security is looking for a new job or career today! That is just inexcuseable ! Expecially since AF One is suppose to have Guards around it 24/7
TruWrecks
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2004
- Messages
- 8,106
- Reaction score
- 21
The legal disclaimer:
Please read the language set forth herein carefully as it may affect, inhibit, modify or otherwise influence the interests or perceptions of any end user (hereinafter "you" or "end user") viewing the preceeding video (also referred to herein and hereas as "The Still Free Video"). You, the viewer of the preceeding are hereby advised that the video does not depict a real event. It is intended for the sole, limited and express purpose of entertainment and to induce you, the viewer of the video, to think critically about freedom of expression and speech and the government's responses to the same. Therefore, and by reason of the foregoing, the producers, creators and distributors of this video hereby verily certify that the foregoing fictionalization and dramatization was not real. Furthermore, and without limitation now, since the beginning of time and without perpituity, the producers, creators and distributors of this video and anyone else who was involved in the making of this video assume no risks or liabilities stemming from or related to your ("the end user's") viewing of same and assume no liability for any damages that result directly or indirectly from mistakes, omissions, interruptions, deletions of files, viruses, errors, defects or any failures of performance, communications failures, theft, destruction or unauthorized access. Copying, duplication and distribution of this video is encouraged.
Please read the language set forth herein carefully as it may affect, inhibit, modify or otherwise influence the interests or perceptions of any end user (hereinafter "you" or "end user") viewing the preceeding video (also referred to herein and hereas as "The Still Free Video"). You, the viewer of the preceeding are hereby advised that the video does not depict a real event. It is intended for the sole, limited and express purpose of entertainment and to induce you, the viewer of the video, to think critically about freedom of expression and speech and the government's responses to the same. Therefore, and by reason of the foregoing, the producers, creators and distributors of this video hereby verily certify that the foregoing fictionalization and dramatization was not real. Furthermore, and without limitation now, since the beginning of time and without perpituity, the producers, creators and distributors of this video and anyone else who was involved in the making of this video assume no risks or liabilities stemming from or related to your ("the end user's") viewing of same and assume no liability for any damages that result directly or indirectly from mistakes, omissions, interruptions, deletions of files, viruses, errors, defects or any failures of performance, communications failures, theft, destruction or unauthorized access. Copying, duplication and distribution of this video is encouraged.
HRJR
Donating Member
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2005
- Messages
- 1,732
- Reaction score
- 6
Hmmm... that got me thinking. Hang around a bunch of naked people in Wal-mart. But wait, most nudists I've seen aren't worth "seeing".What about the nudists that want to shop Wal-Mart naked? Who will stand up for them?
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2003
- Messages
- 15,174
- Reaction score
- 33
Ya know, I am ashamed to admit it but this fugger got me. I was allready writing up my B.S. post explaining why this wasn't actually pulled off. How there are devices on the perimeter that would make it impossible to get to the flight line undetected, Blah Blah Blah... But as I watched the video, yeah not close enough obviously it looked pretty good. The biggest problem I had was scale, there was no way paint out of a can is going to maintain that cohesive of a spray pattern at those distances... BUT Video looked pretty damned good...
I was embarrassed for the SFs on duty. Glad to hear that it was created...
I was embarrassed for the SFs on duty. Glad to hear that it was created...
BUSA_CHeMiST
Donating Member
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2005
- Messages
- 1,250
- Reaction score
- 0
WE WILL VABUSA! WE WILL!! Ill take one for the team!Yeah, and so his point is?
What about the nudists that want to shop Wal-Mart naked? Who will stand up for them?
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2005
- Messages
- 3,980
- Reaction score
- 3
i was gonna say... i know that some of the SF guys on the flightline get bored but to have this happen at Andrews on a jet that the president has access to is a little tall. I saw the video and did a quick search before i went to work so i didnt have a whole lot of time to review the page. I posted it up knowing it would get responses and that i could read them at home after work. I have personally caught a SF flightline guard asleep in his car in an aircraft hanger. Actually we caught him 3 nights in a row sleeping and we woke him up the first 2 nights... the 3rd night we called his boss and told him he had a sleeping airman in his car and that we took his M-16 from the car... they (cops) showed up in 60 seconds and we never saw that airman on the flightline again... something about deriliction of duty and sleeping while on post... it wasnt pretty!
I had the privilege of being a Security Forces Augmentee once during a major inspection for our Wing. We actually played "games" where there were individuals that trying to gain access to the flightline and we used this equipment called MILES gear... basiclly expensive laser tag with real M-16's shooting blanks. If you got shot your MILES gear would emit this terrible sound that could only be turned off by exersize evaluation team members and of course you were dead and couldnt take part in the battle... it was fun but man shooting 3 clips of blanks through a M-16 sure makes it dirty!!
Similar threads
