Nice guns gentlemen. But now I have a question?
I am really, really close to buying a H&K 45 (like maybe tomorrow), but I originally had said I was gonna get a Sig when I started looking.
I have shot H&K 40 before, and it was sweet, but I have never shot a Sig. I have a friend who is an ATF agent and she tried to steer me to a Sig 40.
SO WHAT SHOULD I DO?
Sorry to threadjack, but a brother needs some advice.
Sig also makes a very nice .45
I've owned both full size and compact HK & SIG - both are very nice, but I think its what you like the feel of better. The Sig weighs more, but balance's a lot better in my opinion. Also, I have had several "Stove-Pipes" with full size HK usp .40 - now my compact HK .40 does has never had a failure to fire.
The Sig has a smoother trigger, but no safety...the HK depending on the Variant almost always has a safety (but can be changed not to have one).
Polymer is nice, but like I said it does not balance in the hand as the Sig does. I also think the Sig has less recoil, due in part to more weight. Both have a good factory finish.
Both have different sights, HK use 3 Dot sights, and Sig uses Bar/ Dot (Combat sight) - and the Sig lines up on target for me much quicker...thought I may be alone in this opinion.
For the .45 HK SOCCOM is a beauty, but gonna run you well over $1,500.00 if you can find one...Now Sig has some Tac Driver's also, but for years they focused on a Very high end 9mm...costing several thousand....but their newer .45 is very nice and will deliver great results.
I could go on for hours on the difference's but I would suggest you rent both, and shoot a few mags through each and let your results make the decision. Good luck, and either way you go your gonna be very happy...but they are both very different in my opinion.
Hope this helps