It would be interesting to see feasibility on an add free funding model. Anyone that says 'adds don't work on me' dose not understand modern influence methods and techniques.I subscribe to TV streaming services for content
I subscribe to a few news papers for my daily paper over brekky with coffee in the morning
I subscribe to a local Bike forum to support it as it's relevant for local happenings
I subscribe to a music streaming platform because I love music and I use it when I ride
I am happy to pay for what I use - life and 95% of the things I enjoy have never been free and I pay as required.
My personal opinion is that the post Bernays advertising / influencing ecosystem has become so supply side asymmetric the whole paradigm needs tearing down and re-written for demand side sanity. It is some how legal to intentionally change someone else's personal values, preferences and beliefs without their consent and these days, without the targets knowledge. This is otherwise known as home invasion, theft and rearrangement of the mind, an attack on our cognitive liberty and private intellectual property, a perversion of the first amendment, in violation of the 5th and the 14th and ultimately net negative for societies and individuals writ large. It is illegal to trade in peoples physical bodies and liberties but somehow not to do the same with hearts and minds..
Maybe we should only allow adds from within the org community and it's sponsors and kick the dark lords like Google et al. out..?





