I live in the heart of "Auto worker" country at this point in my life.. There is no possible way they could open the doors without the union workers scabs or no scabs.. They in fact do have a gun to the head of the company and many other associated companies.. The actual auto plants are only a cog in the auto business.. you have all the secondary and tertiary suppliers that probably equal 4 or 5 times the numbers of workers and if they are a union shop, they also close..At contract time they could've refused the contract and hired scabs...
Many of the union members would've crossed the line.
wouldn't be the first company to do it
Why should the UAW agree to pay cuts when the execs still get their perks?
If i was them, I would ride it to the ground...the country can't let the companies totally fail. The UAW knows this. why chance givign up somethign they don't have to. That would be stupid on their part.
Anywho, failure to negotiate and agree to change some things when the company is in such dire straits, well its just stupid. Oh let me continue to make what I make but knowing the company is dead in 2wks. Maybe the cuts wouldnt amount to much on the corporate bottom line but it would have gotten them the bailout.
It saddens me to see people want other people out of work regardless of what they make. We are talking about livelyhoods here people. Many of these people went to work with the rules already in play so should they be punished? I hate to see anyone lose their job or have to go without one paycheck. We can talk all day about who is at fault here but in the end. These companies need help along with the workers. You are talking millions of people out of work including the ones who are not a part of the UAW.( suppliers) I would hate to see if it were our jobs on the line. How would we feel at that point. These people have families who depend on their income to survive. We have some board members who are post job losses almost weekly. Lets have some compassion.
It saddens me to see people want other people out of work regardless of what they make. We are talking about livelyhoods here people. Many of these people went to work with the rules already in play so should they be punished? I hate to see anyone lose their job or have to go without one paycheck. We can talk all day about who is at fault here but in the end. These companies need help along with the workers. You are talking millions of people out of work including the ones who are not a part of the UAW.( suppliers) I would hate to see if it were our jobs on the line. How would we feel at that point. These people have families who depend on their income to survive. We have some board members who are post job losses almost weekly. Lets have some compassion.
who do you think is going to pay to support the unemployed workers?
Posted via Mobile Device
Been there for a week. Pay attention.
r8
Posted via Mobile DeviceFirst thing in my response would be PLEEEEEEEEEEEASE spare me the emotion card. What your speaking to is those people who have themselves so upside down with finances that they have to have the job from GM because they have no skills for anything else that will pay the same amount. I am empthetic with most but the UAW is a perfect expample of a union that has been a part of the problem for many years. It will be good for them to get a taste of real America and what it's like to work all week and barely be able to make ends meet. Have them apply to be a police officer or fireman, some public service and see the piddly pay they get for the risk and job done. I don't want to see anyone out a job make no mistake, however who could not have seen this coming. When it was between UAW and 3 manufacturers it was their reward, now that I am flipping the bill it's my problem. How about we just take the 700 billion and invest it in our infrastructure, new roads, bridges, public buildings and such. We all can use them and the people laid off from the auto industry can do the work... We pay to get them to make new roads, they get a fair paycheck!
Thank God we have individuals that can determine what a fair paycheck is.
Problem solved
Cap
Posted via Mobile Device
A fair paycheck could be defined as:
1. One that is not so high that it breaks the very company you work for.
2. The government doesn't have to step in and keep your business alive.
3. When you compare it to the other jobs of similiar skillset OUTSIDE of the auto industry.
Well you know how us Union members are............
So how many jobs have you taken where you said, "Gee that is a great offer but i'll take less because it is not fair to take so much"
Meanwhile the the CEOs are getting 100x the pay. You don't see them saying wow it really is not fair to pay me 10,000,000 a year.
Posted via Mobile Device
First thing in my response would be PLEEEEEEEEEEEASE spare me the emotion card. What your speaking to is those people who have themselves so upside down with finances that they have to have the job from GM because they have no skills for anything else that will pay the same amount. I am empthetic with most but the UAW is a perfect expample of a union that has been a part of the problem for many years. It will be good for them to get a taste of real America and what it's like to work all week and barely be able to make ends meet. Have them apply to be a police officer or fireman, some public service and see the piddly pay they get for the risk and job done. I don't want to see anyone out a job make no mistake, however who could not have seen this coming. When it was between UAW and 3 manufacturers it was their reward, now that I am flipping the bill it's my problem. How about we just take the 700 billion and invest it in our infrastructure, new roads, bridges, public buildings and such. We all can use them and the people laid off from the auto industry can do the work... We pay to get them to make new roads, they get a fair paycheck!
Problem solved
Cap