got 7 years for legally owned fire arms?

Snakeeyes

Registered
http://http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20101130_Family__New_Jersey_man_serving_7_years_for_guns_he_owned_legally.html


EVERYTHING Brian Aitken was or had worked for was wiped away one winter afternoon after his mother called the police on him.

Separated from his wife, the entrepreneur and media consultant, now 27, had moved back home to New Jersey from Colorado toward the end of 2008 to be closer to their young son.

In between jobs, his well-oiled life was running ragged, and on Jan. 2, 2009, when his ex canceled his visit with their son, he became distraught, muttered something to his mother, and left his parents' home in Mount Laurel, N.J.

"He said something that scared her, things that a guy will only say to his mom, like . . . 'Life's not worth living anymore,' " said Larry Aitken, Brian's father.

Sue Aitken, a trained social worker, decided to play it safe and called police, but she hung up before the 9-1-1 dispatcher could answer. Police traced the call and showed up anyway, and found two handguns in the trunk of Brian's car. And now Brian, her middle child, a graduate student with no prior criminal record, is serving a seven-year prison sentence for weapons charges.

No one blames Sue Aitken for Brian's arrest, except herself maybe, but his father and attorney claim that the Burlington County Prosecutor's Office and the former Superior Court judge who tried the case ignored evidence that proved Brian had the guns legally. The family has asked New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie for clemency and has garnered a great deal of support on a "Free Brian Aitken" Facebook page and among gun-rights advocates.

Aitken and his supporters believe that he had a legal exemption to have the handguns in his car because he was moving from his parents' home to a residence in Hoboken.

"This case is the perfect storm of injustice," said Aitken's attorney, Evan Nappen, of Eatontown, Monmouth County, who specializes in gun laws.

The Burlington County Prosecutor's Office and former Superior Court Judge James Morley said Aitken and his legal team tried during closing arguments to raise an issue related to Aitken's moving that wasn't presented during the trial, but Morley wouldn't consider it. Aitken remains in prison pending his appeal.

A few weeks after Aitken's trial over the summer, Morley learned that Christie was not going to reappoint him, due in part to a 2009 case in which he dismissed animal-cruelty charges against a Moorestown cop accused of sticking his penis into the mouths of five calves. Morley said there was no way of knowing whether the calves had been "puzzled" or "tormented" by the officer's actions.

Nappen thinks the animal-cruelty case exemplifies poor decision-making by Morley.

"Brian didn't receive oral sex from calves; he only lawfully possessed firearms," Nappen said.

A spokesman for Christie acknowledged that his office had received clemency requests for Aitken, but declined to comment further.

Handguns in a duffel bag

When Mount Laurel police arrived at the Aitkens' home on Jan. 2, 2009, they called Brian - who was driving to Hoboken - and asked him to return to his parents' home because they were worried. When he arrived, the cops checked his Honda Civic and, inside the trunk, in a box stuffed into a duffel bag with clothes, they found two handguns, both locked and unloaded as New Jersey law requires.

Aitken had passed an FBI background check to buy them in Colorado when he lived there, his father said, and had contacted New Jersey State Police and discussed the proper way to transport them.

"He bought them at Bass Pro Shops, for God's sake, not some guy named Tony on the street corner," his father said.

New Jersey and Colorado are on opposite ends of the gun-control spectrum. In Colorado, all he needed was the background check to own the guns.

In the Garden State, Aitken was required to have a purchaser's permit from New Jersey to own the guns and a carry permit to have them in his car.

He also was charged with having "large capacity" magazines and hollow-point bullets, which one state gun-control advocate found troubling.

"What little I can glean about the transportation issue leaves me puzzled, but a person with common sense would not be moving illegal products from one place to another by car," said Bryan Miller, executive director of CeaseFire NJ, an organization devoted to reducing gun violence.

"If Mr. Aitken did the research he said he did, he would not have hollow-point bullets and large-capacity magazines in the vehicle," Miller said. "They are illegal, period."

New Jersey allows exemptions for gun owners to transport weapons for hunting or if they are moving from one residence to another. During the trial, Aitken's mother testified that her son was moving things out, and his friend in Hoboken testified he was moving things in. A Mount Laurel officer, according to Larry Aitken, testified that he saw boxes of dishes and clothes in the Honda Civic on the day of the arrest.

The exemption statute, according to the prosecutor's office, specifies that legal guns can be transported "while moving." Despite testimony about his moving to Hoboken, a spokesman for the prosecutor said the evidence suggested that Aitken had moved months earlier, from Colorado to Mount Laurel. "Again, there was no evidence that he was then presently moving," spokesman Joel Bewley said.

After Nappen raised the moving-exemption issue, he said, the jury asked Judge Morley for the exemption statute several times and he refused to hand it over to them. Morley, in a phone interview, echoed the sentiments of the prosecutor's office.

"My recollection of the case is that I ruled he had not presented evidence sufficient to justify giving the jury the charge on the affirmative offense that he was in the process of moving," Morley said.

Morley declined to comment further.

Aitken, who did not testify, was convicted and in August sentenced to prison. His father said that his son was involved in an "incident" after arriving in prison but that he doesn't discuss it.

"This is the most normal, everyday, All-American regular kid, and for this to happen to him is a disgrace," Larry Aitken said. "It's a disgrace of society."
 
I am glad that Judge is not being reappointed (if I read that correctly)...never even offered the Jury what they were asking for~!~
 
Now, that's an example of lack of common sense on the part of the arresting officer and the courts.

Way to go mom, now you'll learn to keep your mouth shut.
 
where did my rights go?
oh yeah- thats right- we keep misplacing them...
cant defend yourself... cant own anything...
its stuff like this that really scares me.
 
Really hard to believe.
There must be more to this story, if both sides were known.
 
Cant blame the mom here... She thought her son was suicidal. I would have called someone too!! If I read it correctly shes a social worker so im sure she knows the signs and wasnt just being a typical crazy mother!!!

Blame the toolbag officers and crazy court system.
 
Kids fault for not knowing NJ law as far as hi-cap mags and hollowpoint ammo goes.
Being a first offense and as straight as the kid seems seven yrs is a bit extreme though.
Ignorance of the law is no excuse and it sounds to me like he had moved months earlier and did have the guns in trunk for another reason? His defense atty tried to use that as a defense and failed. Maybe because they were unable to convince folks he was in process of moving is why he got convicted.
 
Kids fault for not knowing NJ law as far as hi-cap mags and hollowpoint ammo goes.
Being a first offense and as straight as the kid seems seven yrs is a bit extreme though.
Ignorance of the law is no excuse and it sounds to me like he had moved months earlier and did have the guns in trunk for another reason? His defense atty tried to use that as a defense and failed. Maybe because they were unable to convince folks he was in process of moving is why he got convicted.

+1, vote with your feet, dont like the laws dont live there.
 
Laws are created to control criminal activity, not harrass honest everyday citizens. In this case, no matter if he was moving or not, seven years in the big house for possessing two legally purchased guns in the trunk of your car by an everyday Joe with no criminal background is disgraceful to the State of NJ. Thirty days in the local jail would have made the point just as well. Now the citizens of a "BROKE" state will be forced to spend $47K annually to keep this guy in prison. Pitiful state of affairs in NJ.

I am however, extremely impressed with the governor in NJ. I would love to see Gov. Christie in the white house! The man has balls of steel! :bowdown:
 
Laws are created to control criminal activity, not harrass honest everyday citizens. In this case, no matter if he was moving or not, seven years in the big house for possessing two legally purchased guns in the trunk of your car by an everyday Joe with no criminal background is disgraceful to the State of NJ. Thirty days in the local jail would have made the point just as well. Now the citizens of a "BROKE" state will be forced to spend $47K annually to keep this guy in prison. Pitiful state of affairs in NJ.

I am however, extremely impressed with the governor in NJ. I would love to see Gov. Christie in the white house! The man has balls of steel! :bowdown:

I agree with you.
He could have robbed a bank , fled scene at high speed, caused a crash resulting in numerous fatalities , then let the police assault him , and finally sue the police Dept for millions and go home free and rich !
Instead this kid carries two guns in his trunk and gets seven yrs.
And our country makes sense ???
 
Laws are created to control criminal activity, not harrass honest everyday citizens. In this case, no matter if he was moving or not, seven years in the big house for possessing two legally purchased guns in the trunk of your car by an everyday Joe with no criminal background is disgraceful to the State of NJ.

Not just in his trunk. they were unloaded AND had gun locks on them!
 
Kids fault for not knowing NJ law as far as hi-cap mags and hollowpoint ammo goes.
Being a first offense and as straight as the kid seems seven yrs is a bit extreme though.
Ignorance of the law is no excuse and it sounds to me like he had moved months earlier and did have the guns in trunk for another reason?


because home defense is so much better when you have weak sauce bullets and only 5 rounds.

NJ, the armpit of NYC.
 
because home defense is so much better when you have weak sauce bullets and only 5 rounds.

NJ, the armpit of NYC.

home defense is even more awesome when the guns and bullets are locked inside your locked trunk.....

just saying :whistle:
 
Not just in his trunk. they were unloaded AND had gun locks on them!

Well like I said. If he had an Ak47 fully loaded and in plain view on front passenger seat he would have been better off. :)

NJ

What it is . One reason , BIG REASON, why I don't or won't move over seas to Europe. Can't really own guns.

Yes Mysql police and the lives of innocents are absolutely safer with lo-cap mags and FMJs.
Hollow points and hi-cap mags are sooooooo responsible for crime I can't even begin to say :rofl:
 
i'm sorry, but like someone said, there has to be more to both sides of the story than what's presented, but i'm with the consensus that 7 years for 1st time offense is way harsh. 1 year probation to shake him up would be enough.

BUT.. no comments on the insane cop that was let free by the same judge???
 
Gun trouble in the US...I dont believe it.:rofl:

Get estranged from wife.
Get jobless.
Mutter thoughts of suicide.
Put guns in car.

I dunno...???

RSD.
 
Back
Top