Zerks
Registered
I was going through the comments as shown below on the Epoch News website. The consensus is pretty consistent. At the same time people still believe the MSM narratives.
The fact that our government arranged to sealed records for 100 years before they can be opened tells me that people high-up in government were involved in his murder.
REPLY
SHARE
+537
Show 38 Replies
G
Gary Snyder
1 month ago
Nobody believes this.
Why does the government still hide files from the public.
After all the other crap they pulled even today.
Who would believe it.
REPLY
SHARE
+354
Show 10 Replies
D
Dallywhacker
1 month ago
How did this drivel make it to the Epoch Times? He got his ‘basics’ from the Warren Report? Mercy.
REPLY
SHARE
+332
Show 13 Replies
L
Leonardo Gambardella
1 month ago
Yawn. And geriatric pedophile jo won with 82 million votes.
REPLY
SHARE
+259
Show 3 Replies
S
Stopthe Insanity
1 month ago
Yes of course, it was all just a crazy “conspiracy theory,” and the fbi and cia are thoughtful well intentioned public servants, and Biden is the best president we have ever had. I must go check in with cnn now to find out what is the latest “news” and get their guidance on what to think.
…oh wait, I can get that right here …apparently
REPLY
SHARE
+245
Show 6 Replies
S
sschuess1
1 month ago
So now even the epoch times have been taken over for government propaganda, where do we go now
REPLY
SHARE
+201
Show 3 Replies
O
obien
1 month ago
This sounds like a left wing article from the Huffington Post… as more and more evidence mounts and points directly to the CIA and the FBI / government institutions actually committing the crime, he’s going back to the most improbable cause?
I really thought EPOCH TIMES was truthful; apparently they’re infiltrated by radical leftists too.
REPLY
SHARE
+193
Show 2 Replies
P
PHMueller56
1 month ago
The author changed his opinion that the Kennedy assassination was not a conspiracy because he visited Dealey Plaza??? Has he looked at the evidence collected by the Assassination Records Review Board from 1992 to 1998? Using just one example, through interviews the ARRB established that medical personnel in Parkland Hospital viewed a large open wound in the back of Kennedy’s head, indicating the kill shot was from the front. Those medical personnel were also prevented from completing an autopsy that was required by Texas state law at the time. As soon as Kennedy was declared dead, Secret Service personnel took Kennedy’s body away from Parkland with the threat of violence. Can the author explain that?
A deep state intelligence plot (probably led by fired CIA director Allan Dulles and LBJ), under the pretense of protecting the country from Communism, would neatly explain it.
This article omits so much that clouds the assassination to this day. So many people don’t want to look at recently released evidence. They don’t want to face the fact that our country may have been captured by an unaccountable fourth branch of government (the Intelligence Branch) since 1947 when the CIA was established.
The CIA was in the business of undermining other countries. They wouldn’t use their expertise to undermine the USA, even if they arrogantly thought they were saving the country from “the Reds”, would they?
Much better to believe Oswald did it. It’s a simpler story to tell our children.
REPLY
SHARE
+170
Show 13 Replies
W
wime Wime
1 month ago
It was a conspiracy.
There are conspiracies when people conspire together to create an illegal plan or cause subversion.
The CIA killed the president.
The mafia had their hands on it. And Lee Harvey Oswald was who he said he was, a patsy.
REPLY
SHARE
+157
Show 4 Replies
R
RVSCHENCK
1 month ago
I read somewhere that Trump told Judge Napolitano that if he saw what was in the files, he
wouldn’t release them either. Even if that’s not true, NOT releasing information in the government’s possession has to make people very suspicious.
If it was just Oswald then why hold them back?
This is just like Pfizer not releasing records on the jab for 75 years.
We see why that was now, right ?
REPLY
SHARE
+143
Show 2 Replies
T
T
1 month ago
If the gov’t is innocent in all of this, why haven’t they released ALL the records.
You’d think the gov’t would understand that shielding records after all this time fuels these theories.
REPLY
SHARE
+116
Show 1 Reply
O
Owend
1 month ago
I don’t buy it. There was a conspiracy. As others have posted here, why does the govt. hide the files from the public? What is it they don’t want us to see? Robert Kennedy Jr. believes that it was a plot. So do I. Too many people surrounding this tragedy died. It was too many to be just a coincidence. Too many questions and no answers.
REPLY
SHARE
+92
Show 1 Reply
R
rorybpeterson
1 month ago
Zapruder film shows kill shot came from in front- not behind. Replicate that with dummy and ballistic gel from behind then.
REPLY
SHARE
+91
Show 8 Replies
G
gdemunda
1 month ago
I am really disappointed that The Epoch Times would print such garbage!
REPLY
SHARE
+89
Show 2 Replies
M
mrickenbac
1 month ago
WTF????
The Government tells us he was shot in the BACK of his head, YET we can clearly see in the video his head jerks BACKWARDS!!!
That means he HAD to have been shot in the FRONT.
That’s just basic logic!!!
Which means he WAS NOT SHOT from the Book Depository and therefore Lee Harvey Oswald DID NOT SHOOT HIM!!
It was a sniper in the FRONT of the car, not the rear of the car!!
STOP ONCE AGAIN TRYING TO TELL US TO NOT BELIEVE OUR EYES!!
REPLY
SHARE
+82
Show 3 Replies
S
Scott Buck
1 month ago
Need another clue?
If Oswald was the lone shooter,
Why in the HELL didn’t he take the Pop Shot while the motorcade slowed making the tite turn from Houston onto Elm WHILE THE CAR WAS DEAD IN FRONT OF HIM?
Explain that Hans!
You’re an idiot.
C
I
A
REPLY
SHARE
+78
Show 3 Replies
J
John B
1 month ago
This much EVERY sober, reasonable, patriotic American knows: the CIA has maintained a legacy of corruption unrivaled in modern history, with a particular penchant for coups d’etat. I’m no adherent to JFK’s utterly absurd mythology, but if the CIA didn’t do it, it certainly deserves the blame for it.
REPLY
SHARE
+67
Show 4 Replies
S
SANDRA MARTINEZ
1 month ago
CIA did that.
REPLY
SHARE
+62
Show 4 Replies
J
jules clay
1 month ago
A well-argued account.
It’s difficult to find Oswald innocent of involvement in Kennedy’s murder – his actions immediately before and after are those of a guilty party.
However, this analysis, like many others, suffers from either/or thinking.
There’s lots of evidence that shots came from the front, including lots of witness testimony that the windshield was penetrated from the front; we also have testimony regarding the smell of gunpowder and the sighting of smoke from the grassy knoll, and Kennedy’s head wound with the back of the head blown out from a shot from the front.
Dealey Plaza was an ideal shooting gallery for assassins; I wouldn’t rule out the possibility that we have Oswald shooting from the TSD and other actors, unrelated to Oswald, shooting from the front.
REPLY
SHARE
+57
Show 5 Replies
L
Lin
1 month ago
I believe RFK Jr. had studied this a lot more and he says it’s the CIA.
Grassy Knoll was more likely to be the shooting position than from behind as JFK was turning his head all the time looking from left to right and the car was moving.
Can’t even count the number of documentaries
on the JFK assassination by now.
But It’s could not be the weak man Olswald with an old riffle that doesn’t aim well that killed JFK.
REPLY
SHARE
+53
Show 2 Replies
P
pastorcephas
1 month ago
The cold hard facts are that you are a shill for the IC.
What is Epoch thinking
by paying you for this drivel?
Now I can’t even trust the ET for reliable commentary.
This article is an embarrassment to any thinking person.
You may be thought of as a legal expert, but I hope I am never unfortunate to have you as my counsel,
REPLY
SHARE
+46
J
jerome.kohn
1 month ago
This article is ludicrous. It seems to suggest that the killings of both Kennedy and Oswald were “opportunistic killings,” but at the same time suggests careful planning. Oswald likely was involved in some way, but it was likely as he claimed before his own assassination. He was set up to be the patsy. Maybe he was one of the shooters but certainly not the only one. All the evidence points to multiple shooters. The notion that Ruby killed Oswald out of concern for Jackie Kennedy having to endure a trial of her husband’s killer is also ridiculous. It is not as if Ruby was a close personal friend of the first lady, and no one commits murder for such a frivolous reason. The problem for the conspirators was that Oswald knew too much, and from his public “patsy” claim, it looked like he was ready to talk. The conspirators had likely planned for Oswald to be killed by police rather than be taken alive. Then there is the Zapruder film and the testimony of Parkland Hospital doctors and nurses who noted the exit wound in the back of Kennedy’s head that clearly indicated that he was shot from the front. Kennedy’s body was quickly rushed out of the hospital and out of Texas over the angry objections of the county coroner to prevent a proper autopsy. The behavior of everyone around was suspicious to say the least.
REPLY
SHARE
+45
Show 1 Reply
A
arktos 99
1 month ago
First of all the title says RFK, not JFK, a Freudian slip to tell us you have no freaking idea what you’re talking about. Wow, ET really dropped the ball on this one. You really think we’re idiots, don’t you?!
REPLY
SHARE
+39
Show 2 Replies
R
Realmkeyper
1 month ago
Man, that’s a great article you just wrote, Gerry Ford!
ANY explanation – SIXTY YEARS LATER – for the Abraham Zapruder footage you failed to suppress, that clearly shows JFK was shot from a triangulated position?
REPLY
SHARE
+39
A
Annie Palatynusz
1 month ago
I’ve believed for years that Oswald did not act alone and somehow the govt was involved. Believe to many threats and hush money was doled out to keep the truth hidden. After watching what they’ve done to President Trump the last 8 years it just confirms for me that the govt will do anything to anyone no matter what your position.
If it could only be stopped.
REPLY
SHARE
+37
U
USA Liberty Lover
1 month ago
The is a BS article written by a cool aid drinker and written for sheep.
REPLY
SHARE
+36
C
Constitution law
1 month ago
The more there is disclosed about President Kennedy’s assassination, the more it points to a government job and coverup.
Never will I be convinced Oswald was the lone gunman.
He was a pawn in their game.
Corruption was and is still rampant.
May God help us!
REPLY
SHARE
+36
S
szachary101
1 month ago
Wait wait wait, you study your life away on something the US government still hasn’t released the full records on? But then you think the USG is telling the truth. I understand you don’t want to admit you wasted your life on this but you could have told us that in less than 50000 word essay.
REPLY
SHARE
+36
M
Mark Stronge
1 month ago
This is an insult to the readership of ET.
REPLY
SHARE
+33
T
tennisgirl942
1 month ago
Beyond disappointed in EPOCH publishing such “facts” cherry-picked by the author to create another illusion to feed to American citizens. As a Christian and Patriot, I reject this poorly researched article.
REPLY
SHARE
+32
M
Michael Kaiser
1 month ago
I’m sorry but after all the research I’ve done I think papa Bush and the CIA were directly involved.
REPLY
SHARE
+32
Show 1 Reply
A
American Citizen
1 month ago
HEADLINE—ET GOES WOKE.
REPLY
SHARE
+30
A
Arek Petrosian
1 month ago
I had to check the date on this article, to make sure it wasn’t posted on April 1st.
I am guessing that this article is presented to show an opposing viewpoint?
And by “opposing”, I mean, “opposed to rational, intelligent thought.”
REPLY
SHARE
+29
T
TechWriter
1 month ago
ET, this is not a report.
This poorly written piece is an editorial at best.
Why did you publish this?
REPLY
SHARE
+29
C
claire.stadtmueller
1 month ago
And what is your idea of “unhinged 9⁄11 trutherism?”
Why would the writer even use the word conspiracy in an article about JFK’s assassination when it was the distrust of the stories we were fed that prompted the CIA to promote the phrase conspiracy theories to discredit those of us with critical thinking skills. And really, does the caption need to tell us those are tennis rackets? And the headline reads RFK? Is someone not getting enough sleep?
REPLY
SHARE
+28
Show 1 Reply
D
Dennis Martin
1 month ago
Please don’t ever insult the intelligence of your readers with this type of NATIONAL ENQUIRER story again..
REPLY
SHARE
+27
F
fortheluvofamerica
1 month ago
A lot of work and words here, Hans, but it does little to support your conclusion; and there’s a LOT you haven’t addressed or just completely deviated from; too much to even begin to enumerate in a comment window.
Oh, and you got the title of the article wrong; it’s JKF, not RFK…
Epoch times, you’re going to lose credibility and subscribers with this piece of trash reporting.
REPLY
SHARE
+27
Show 1 Reply
J
jimstix66
1 month ago
I’m very disappointed to see an article such as this on this site.
While I don’t claim to know exactly what happened in Dallas 60 years ago today, I do know that it wasn’t what The Warren Commission says happened.
Not even close.
Anyone with any ability to critically analyze the report itself as well as the people who were appointed to run it will come to the same conclusion.
Oswald was a patsy and the Warren Commission was established by very powerful men to cover up the murder of JFK and anyone in this day and age who is still promoting it’s validity is simply trying to reenforce the lie that LHO killed JFK.
I expect far greater journalism from The Epoch Times.
REPLY
SHARE
+25
R
richknowles
1 month ago
Funny. I always thought opinion piece writers were intelligent and weren’t hired mouthpieces for the corrupt federal US government. And after reading this opinion piece, something changed.
REPLY
SHARE
+24
I Always Thought the JFK Assassination Was a Conspiracy, Then Something Changed
A personal journey of investigating what really happened in Dallas and the surprising road it went down.
www.theepochtimes.com
The fact that our government arranged to sealed records for 100 years before they can be opened tells me that people high-up in government were involved in his murder.
REPLY
SHARE
+537
Show 38 Replies
G
Gary Snyder
1 month ago
Nobody believes this.
Why does the government still hide files from the public.
After all the other crap they pulled even today.
Who would believe it.
REPLY
SHARE
+354
Show 10 Replies
D
Dallywhacker
1 month ago
How did this drivel make it to the Epoch Times? He got his ‘basics’ from the Warren Report? Mercy.
REPLY
SHARE
+332
Show 13 Replies
L
Leonardo Gambardella
1 month ago
Yawn. And geriatric pedophile jo won with 82 million votes.
REPLY
SHARE
+259
Show 3 Replies
S
Stopthe Insanity
1 month ago
Yes of course, it was all just a crazy “conspiracy theory,” and the fbi and cia are thoughtful well intentioned public servants, and Biden is the best president we have ever had. I must go check in with cnn now to find out what is the latest “news” and get their guidance on what to think.
…oh wait, I can get that right here …apparently
REPLY
SHARE
+245
Show 6 Replies
S
sschuess1
1 month ago
So now even the epoch times have been taken over for government propaganda, where do we go now
REPLY
SHARE
+201
Show 3 Replies
O
obien
1 month ago
This sounds like a left wing article from the Huffington Post… as more and more evidence mounts and points directly to the CIA and the FBI / government institutions actually committing the crime, he’s going back to the most improbable cause?
I really thought EPOCH TIMES was truthful; apparently they’re infiltrated by radical leftists too.
REPLY
SHARE
+193
Show 2 Replies
P
PHMueller56
1 month ago
The author changed his opinion that the Kennedy assassination was not a conspiracy because he visited Dealey Plaza??? Has he looked at the evidence collected by the Assassination Records Review Board from 1992 to 1998? Using just one example, through interviews the ARRB established that medical personnel in Parkland Hospital viewed a large open wound in the back of Kennedy’s head, indicating the kill shot was from the front. Those medical personnel were also prevented from completing an autopsy that was required by Texas state law at the time. As soon as Kennedy was declared dead, Secret Service personnel took Kennedy’s body away from Parkland with the threat of violence. Can the author explain that?
A deep state intelligence plot (probably led by fired CIA director Allan Dulles and LBJ), under the pretense of protecting the country from Communism, would neatly explain it.
This article omits so much that clouds the assassination to this day. So many people don’t want to look at recently released evidence. They don’t want to face the fact that our country may have been captured by an unaccountable fourth branch of government (the Intelligence Branch) since 1947 when the CIA was established.
The CIA was in the business of undermining other countries. They wouldn’t use their expertise to undermine the USA, even if they arrogantly thought they were saving the country from “the Reds”, would they?
Much better to believe Oswald did it. It’s a simpler story to tell our children.
REPLY
SHARE
+170
Show 13 Replies
W
wime Wime
1 month ago
It was a conspiracy.
There are conspiracies when people conspire together to create an illegal plan or cause subversion.
The CIA killed the president.
The mafia had their hands on it. And Lee Harvey Oswald was who he said he was, a patsy.
REPLY
SHARE
+157
Show 4 Replies
R
RVSCHENCK
1 month ago
I read somewhere that Trump told Judge Napolitano that if he saw what was in the files, he
wouldn’t release them either. Even if that’s not true, NOT releasing information in the government’s possession has to make people very suspicious.
If it was just Oswald then why hold them back?
This is just like Pfizer not releasing records on the jab for 75 years.
We see why that was now, right ?
REPLY
SHARE
+143
Show 2 Replies
T
T
1 month ago
If the gov’t is innocent in all of this, why haven’t they released ALL the records.
You’d think the gov’t would understand that shielding records after all this time fuels these theories.
REPLY
SHARE
+116
Show 1 Reply
O
Owend
1 month ago
I don’t buy it. There was a conspiracy. As others have posted here, why does the govt. hide the files from the public? What is it they don’t want us to see? Robert Kennedy Jr. believes that it was a plot. So do I. Too many people surrounding this tragedy died. It was too many to be just a coincidence. Too many questions and no answers.
REPLY
SHARE
+92
Show 1 Reply
R
rorybpeterson
1 month ago
Zapruder film shows kill shot came from in front- not behind. Replicate that with dummy and ballistic gel from behind then.
REPLY
SHARE
+91
Show 8 Replies
G
gdemunda
1 month ago
I am really disappointed that The Epoch Times would print such garbage!
REPLY
SHARE
+89
Show 2 Replies
M
mrickenbac
1 month ago
WTF????
The Government tells us he was shot in the BACK of his head, YET we can clearly see in the video his head jerks BACKWARDS!!!
That means he HAD to have been shot in the FRONT.
That’s just basic logic!!!
Which means he WAS NOT SHOT from the Book Depository and therefore Lee Harvey Oswald DID NOT SHOOT HIM!!
It was a sniper in the FRONT of the car, not the rear of the car!!
STOP ONCE AGAIN TRYING TO TELL US TO NOT BELIEVE OUR EYES!!
REPLY
SHARE
+82
Show 3 Replies
S
Scott Buck
1 month ago
Need another clue?
If Oswald was the lone shooter,
Why in the HELL didn’t he take the Pop Shot while the motorcade slowed making the tite turn from Houston onto Elm WHILE THE CAR WAS DEAD IN FRONT OF HIM?
Explain that Hans!
You’re an idiot.
C
I
A
REPLY
SHARE
+78
Show 3 Replies
J
John B
1 month ago
This much EVERY sober, reasonable, patriotic American knows: the CIA has maintained a legacy of corruption unrivaled in modern history, with a particular penchant for coups d’etat. I’m no adherent to JFK’s utterly absurd mythology, but if the CIA didn’t do it, it certainly deserves the blame for it.
REPLY
SHARE
+67
Show 4 Replies
S
SANDRA MARTINEZ
1 month ago
CIA did that.
REPLY
SHARE
+62
Show 4 Replies
J
jules clay
1 month ago
A well-argued account.
It’s difficult to find Oswald innocent of involvement in Kennedy’s murder – his actions immediately before and after are those of a guilty party.
However, this analysis, like many others, suffers from either/or thinking.
There’s lots of evidence that shots came from the front, including lots of witness testimony that the windshield was penetrated from the front; we also have testimony regarding the smell of gunpowder and the sighting of smoke from the grassy knoll, and Kennedy’s head wound with the back of the head blown out from a shot from the front.
Dealey Plaza was an ideal shooting gallery for assassins; I wouldn’t rule out the possibility that we have Oswald shooting from the TSD and other actors, unrelated to Oswald, shooting from the front.
REPLY
SHARE
+57
Show 5 Replies
L
Lin
1 month ago
I believe RFK Jr. had studied this a lot more and he says it’s the CIA.
Grassy Knoll was more likely to be the shooting position than from behind as JFK was turning his head all the time looking from left to right and the car was moving.
Can’t even count the number of documentaries
on the JFK assassination by now.
But It’s could not be the weak man Olswald with an old riffle that doesn’t aim well that killed JFK.
REPLY
SHARE
+53
Show 2 Replies
P
pastorcephas
1 month ago
The cold hard facts are that you are a shill for the IC.
What is Epoch thinking
by paying you for this drivel?
Now I can’t even trust the ET for reliable commentary.
This article is an embarrassment to any thinking person.
You may be thought of as a legal expert, but I hope I am never unfortunate to have you as my counsel,
REPLY
SHARE
+46
J
jerome.kohn
1 month ago
This article is ludicrous. It seems to suggest that the killings of both Kennedy and Oswald were “opportunistic killings,” but at the same time suggests careful planning. Oswald likely was involved in some way, but it was likely as he claimed before his own assassination. He was set up to be the patsy. Maybe he was one of the shooters but certainly not the only one. All the evidence points to multiple shooters. The notion that Ruby killed Oswald out of concern for Jackie Kennedy having to endure a trial of her husband’s killer is also ridiculous. It is not as if Ruby was a close personal friend of the first lady, and no one commits murder for such a frivolous reason. The problem for the conspirators was that Oswald knew too much, and from his public “patsy” claim, it looked like he was ready to talk. The conspirators had likely planned for Oswald to be killed by police rather than be taken alive. Then there is the Zapruder film and the testimony of Parkland Hospital doctors and nurses who noted the exit wound in the back of Kennedy’s head that clearly indicated that he was shot from the front. Kennedy’s body was quickly rushed out of the hospital and out of Texas over the angry objections of the county coroner to prevent a proper autopsy. The behavior of everyone around was suspicious to say the least.
REPLY
SHARE
+45
Show 1 Reply
A
arktos 99
1 month ago
First of all the title says RFK, not JFK, a Freudian slip to tell us you have no freaking idea what you’re talking about. Wow, ET really dropped the ball on this one. You really think we’re idiots, don’t you?!
REPLY
SHARE
+39
Show 2 Replies
R
Realmkeyper
1 month ago
Man, that’s a great article you just wrote, Gerry Ford!
ANY explanation – SIXTY YEARS LATER – for the Abraham Zapruder footage you failed to suppress, that clearly shows JFK was shot from a triangulated position?
REPLY
SHARE
+39
A
Annie Palatynusz
1 month ago
I’ve believed for years that Oswald did not act alone and somehow the govt was involved. Believe to many threats and hush money was doled out to keep the truth hidden. After watching what they’ve done to President Trump the last 8 years it just confirms for me that the govt will do anything to anyone no matter what your position.
If it could only be stopped.
REPLY
SHARE
+37
U
USA Liberty Lover
1 month ago
The is a BS article written by a cool aid drinker and written for sheep.
REPLY
SHARE
+36
C
Constitution law
1 month ago
The more there is disclosed about President Kennedy’s assassination, the more it points to a government job and coverup.
Never will I be convinced Oswald was the lone gunman.
He was a pawn in their game.
Corruption was and is still rampant.
May God help us!
REPLY
SHARE
+36
S
szachary101
1 month ago
Wait wait wait, you study your life away on something the US government still hasn’t released the full records on? But then you think the USG is telling the truth. I understand you don’t want to admit you wasted your life on this but you could have told us that in less than 50000 word essay.
REPLY
SHARE
+36
M
Mark Stronge
1 month ago
This is an insult to the readership of ET.
REPLY
SHARE
+33
T
tennisgirl942
1 month ago
Beyond disappointed in EPOCH publishing such “facts” cherry-picked by the author to create another illusion to feed to American citizens. As a Christian and Patriot, I reject this poorly researched article.
REPLY
SHARE
+32
M
Michael Kaiser
1 month ago
I’m sorry but after all the research I’ve done I think papa Bush and the CIA were directly involved.
REPLY
SHARE
+32
Show 1 Reply
A
American Citizen
1 month ago
HEADLINE—ET GOES WOKE.
REPLY
SHARE
+30
A
Arek Petrosian
1 month ago
I had to check the date on this article, to make sure it wasn’t posted on April 1st.
I am guessing that this article is presented to show an opposing viewpoint?
And by “opposing”, I mean, “opposed to rational, intelligent thought.”
REPLY
SHARE
+29
T
TechWriter
1 month ago
ET, this is not a report.
This poorly written piece is an editorial at best.
Why did you publish this?
REPLY
SHARE
+29
C
claire.stadtmueller
1 month ago
And what is your idea of “unhinged 9⁄11 trutherism?”
Why would the writer even use the word conspiracy in an article about JFK’s assassination when it was the distrust of the stories we were fed that prompted the CIA to promote the phrase conspiracy theories to discredit those of us with critical thinking skills. And really, does the caption need to tell us those are tennis rackets? And the headline reads RFK? Is someone not getting enough sleep?
REPLY
SHARE
+28
Show 1 Reply
D
Dennis Martin
1 month ago
Please don’t ever insult the intelligence of your readers with this type of NATIONAL ENQUIRER story again..
REPLY
SHARE
+27
F
fortheluvofamerica
1 month ago
A lot of work and words here, Hans, but it does little to support your conclusion; and there’s a LOT you haven’t addressed or just completely deviated from; too much to even begin to enumerate in a comment window.
Oh, and you got the title of the article wrong; it’s JKF, not RFK…
Epoch times, you’re going to lose credibility and subscribers with this piece of trash reporting.
REPLY
SHARE
+27
Show 1 Reply
J
jimstix66
1 month ago
I’m very disappointed to see an article such as this on this site.
While I don’t claim to know exactly what happened in Dallas 60 years ago today, I do know that it wasn’t what The Warren Commission says happened.
Not even close.
Anyone with any ability to critically analyze the report itself as well as the people who were appointed to run it will come to the same conclusion.
Oswald was a patsy and the Warren Commission was established by very powerful men to cover up the murder of JFK and anyone in this day and age who is still promoting it’s validity is simply trying to reenforce the lie that LHO killed JFK.
I expect far greater journalism from The Epoch Times.
REPLY
SHARE
+25
R
richknowles
1 month ago
Funny. I always thought opinion piece writers were intelligent and weren’t hired mouthpieces for the corrupt federal US government. And after reading this opinion piece, something changed.
REPLY
SHARE
+24