Tried the clutchless shifting......

I'm very apprehensive about clutchless shifting. I always use a clutch.

You know what I really would like to see? A long term experiment on two similar bikes. One where rider used clutch always and one where rider didnt. Then wanna compare the gear wear and tears and the transmission conditions.

Coz I still somehow believe mechanically a clutchless shift puts more stress on the parts.
 
I'm very apprehensive about clutchless shifting. I always use a clutch.

You know what I really would like to see? A long term experiment on two similar bikes. One where rider used clutch always and one where rider didnt. Then wanna compare the gear wear and tears and the transmission conditions.

Coz I still somehow believe mechanically a clutchless shift puts more stress on the parts.

It's the other way around - clutched upshifts put more strain on the tranny than clutchless. here is the other thread - look at post #9.
 
Last edited:
Oh fer crystz sake....all a y'all put yer big girl panties on and just do it...

:poke::laugh:

cheers
ken


Cut and paste from.

Clutchless Shifting - Sport Rider Magazine Online

Clutchless Shifting - Riding Skills Series
Upshifting Without A Clutch
From the April, 2007 issue of Sport Rider

Once its fundamental theory is understood, the skill of clutchless upshifting is typically mastered in a matter of minutes. For first-timers, snicking slickly through the gears without the clutch brings a smile of wonderment, as if they just learned a new magic trick.

Surprisingly, the last time this shifting trick was discussed in these pages it brought about a storm of controversy that continues through Sport Rider correspondence to this day. It's actually a time-honored technique that I first read about in a Motorcyclist story about Eddie Lawson more than two decades ago. After that story was published, Lawson earned four Grand Prix world championships, all before the rider-aid wizardry of electric shifters, which, by the way, use the same basic principles discussed here. Anyone who still doubts the advantages of clutchless upshifting is welcome argue with Mr. Lawson, though last time I checked he still isn't one to lose at anything.

Though it's difficult for many to initially accept, upshifting without a clutch is in many ways simpler than the conventional pull-the-clutch-in-while-rolling-off-the-gas, shift-up,let-the-clutch-out-smoothly-while-rolling-back-on-the-gas method most of us grew up using. Instead, simply preload the shifter lightly, then quickly let off the throttle slightly and then back on and-presto-you're in the next gear. Done correctly, a clutchless upshift sounds and feels like that of an electric shifter, and no, it's not abusive to the transmission; countless years of the SR staff racing their personal bikes stand witness to this. The key qualifier here is the phrase "done correctly." Fortunately this is as easy to feel as it is to learn.

First, understand that while accelerating, even mildly, you're able to lightly lift (preload) the shift lever with your toe without causing the transmission to shift or pop out of gear. By lightly, we mean perhaps two to four pounds of upward pressure for a moment before your desired shift point. Then, as the tach sweeps past the desired rpm, simply crack the throttle slightly off, then instantly back on, as quick as a blink of an eye. Don't fully shut the throttle; only close it enough to momentarily reverse the acceleration load on the transmission before returning the twist grip to its original position. Remember to release the pressure on the shift lever after the shift to allow the mechanism to ratchet back and index the next gear.

As Kevin Schwantz teaches at his school, clutchless upshifting doesn't have to be under full-throttle acceleration and, in fact, is best learned under moderate acceleration at partial throttle. Once mastered, however, you'll find that it works at any speed and any rpm. Initially, it takes a bit of trial and error to get the timing and feel for it, and different bikes may require slightly different amounts of throttle change or quickness of movement, but you'll know when you hit the right combination. The shifter should snick into gear with a smooth movement and no notchiness. The bike's acceleration between gears should be virtually seamless.

All this clutch-free shifting business isn't just to impress your friends or passenger, however; there are several tangible advantages as well. As a man who earned his living (and the '93 world championship) wrestling savagely unsophisticated two-stroke GP bikes before the days of engine-management software, Schwantz is able to demonstrate that a well-executed clutchless upshift upsets the bike less than a conventional shift. In my 26 years of experience, I miss fewer shifts when I shift without using the lever on my left handlebar. Exiting right-hand corners with my body hung off to the inside (I'm talking track riding here, since, for several reasons, I do not hang off on the street), it's far easier to just snap back the throttle for an upshift than to make sure my left forearm is in position to allow my fingers to properly manipulate the clutch as well. It's simply one less thing to do, one less thing to think about and one less thing to go wrong.

We're not saying you should forget about using the clutch entirely; there are plenty of situations where it's likely to be to your advantage. But at the same time, clutchless upshifting is a skill worth learning. Don't get discouraged if it doesn't come to you on your first, second or 16th time. Practice it in a parking lot, or on a remote stretch of straight road, at moderate speed in an environment that allows you to give this novel technique your full attention and, by trial and error, varying the quickness and amount of throttle movement, it will come to you. When the situations warrant it, using your new shifting skill should give you all the satisfaction of pulling a rabbit out of a hat.
 
I'm very apprehensive about clutchless shifting. I always use a clutch.

You know what I really would like to see? A long term experiment on two similar bikes. One where rider used clutch always and one where rider didnt. Then wanna compare the gear wear and tears and the transmission conditions.

Coz I still somehow believe mechanically a clutchless shift puts more stress on the parts.
Well I've had about 60 different streetbikes over the years, almost always use the clutch, puts lots of miles on them, and never had a transmission problem ever. My brother has owned almost as many (trying to keep up I guess, you know the brother thing :laugh: ) and has had transmission problems in the majority of his that he's kept for any length of time. He never uses the clutch. We've both been riding since kids and are only a few years apart in age. Abuse from clutchless shifting won't show up until later down the road if you're lucky, so alot of times if you don't keep a bike that long you'll think clutchless shifting is fine , and its the next owner who has to deal with the problems. Thats not always the case, but from what I've seen more often than not the guys I've ridden with that clutchless shift and keep a bike for a long time have more tranny problems than the guys who keep their bikes for the same length of time and use the clutch to shift. Just my years of observations with sportbike clubs/tracks/friends/relatives/etc.
 
The only time I touch my clutch is to stop or start... I might be doing more damage ... I dunno :dunno:

I try not to down shift that way.. but I am guilty of doing it occasionally.

almost took the words out of my mouth Jules.
Starts and stops and when I take off totally slow, then I do it to.
Down shift... most often a yes

:thumbsup:
 
Back
Top