I'm sure if you're running stock and don't do much racing the stock tranny is fine, but to assume that everyone that's ever had a second gear issue is "young and doing something wrong" is just plain stupid. 17th bike in 31 years of racing/riding and mine had a second and sixth gear issue from the day I bought it (they share the same shift fork). I noticed it on the way home from the dealer. Lost 6th at 12k and by 16k had lost both. My bike has been over 225 hp since 8k miles and I'm sure that accelerated the problem, but it had an inherent problem from the day I got it.Same with me, always use the clutch and have never had a tranny prob EVER, on any of my bikes+1 usw the Clutch all the time on both my Busa's and never had a tranny problem and tell your friend they put the clutch there for a reasonI got an 06 busa and an 06 750 gixxer and no problems. I always use the clutch. It only takes me 1 finger an a half a second to use it.I've owned lots of bikes, and lots of suzuki's too, and have ran them VERY hard, but I always make sure I get clean shifts....with a clutchI always hear guys saying its just fine to clutchless shift on bikes, but yet those same guys always seem to have tranny probs they blame on the machinery or want factory recalls ect?These guys are young and positive its all suzuki's fault. 3 low mileage bikes and 3 second gear failures? Can't be anything they're doing right?
I manned up and got an undercut tranny and everything is fine now - so I guess I shouldn't let it bother me when some dumb@ss insinuates that I only lost my tranny because I "don't know how to ride".
Well, with only 5 documented cases of frame cracks out of approximately 11,000 '06 & '07 '14's, I am not exactly loosing sleep over it. .9994545% of the bikes are fine. Sure a few more will turn up in the recall.AM -->I think I would like my trans. to break. instead of the frame breaking.kennym4 @ Jun. 09 2008 said:1444148[/ATTACH] AM]
The guys that switched to the 14 say that's the most noticable thing, the tranny ?
AM -->I think I would like my trans. to break. instead of the frame breaking.kennym4 @ Jun. 09 2008 said:1444151[/ATTACH] AM]
The guys that switched to the 14 say that's the most noticable thing, the tranny ?
I was referring to the guys in my original post, and the young guys we all know like them.....you know, the ones you'd never buy a bike from?Obviously it's a touchy subject for me - sorry about my early morning insulting rant. Guess I'll call my doc now about some kind of anti-depressant.
All good points - and thanks for not ripping into me in response to my @sshole post.I was referring to the guys in my original post, and the young guys we all know like them.....you know, the ones you'd never buy a bike from?Obviously it's a touchy subject for me - sorry about my early morning insulting rant. Guess I'll call my doc now about some kind of anti-depressant.Sometimes things just break...and busa's do seem to have a bit of a rep for weak 2nd gearsBut I do think with just a bit of care you can have a suzi tranny last a long time. Unfortunately the guys I'm referring to are complete animals on their bikes, and it just irritates me that they have the balls to blame the brand of bike because they destroy stuff. I think the guys who fit into this category know who they are
I do sometimes wonder though about the "so called" weak 2nd gears on some machines. I had an FJ-1100, rode the hell outta that thing for years and never had a lick of trouble with the "weak" 2nd gear (awesome bikes by the way) Also had an early ZX-11 with the "weak" 2nd, same deal, no probs after hammering it for thousands of milesBut I also always used the clutch, and if I missed a shift race over. I slowed down and eased it back into gear. No slamming it back into gear trying to salvage an already lost race