I would love to ride it, beautiful bike. I'm imagining that we're only a few years away from having those wings be smart, ie active management.
Because now they don't make any sense at all. If you look at all the MotoGP tracks, and you have enough good data to average the speed (and lean angle) at all the apexes, I guess you can design a wing that will give you a little extra downforce on the front tire that mathematically makes sense. But the drag is going to cost you everywhere else, and especially on the straights. And you'd still have problematic drag even if you had a little servo minimizing the wing when not providing downforce.
For a street bike a fixed wing is nonsensical. You'd have to be pushing the bike much faster than I want to ride on public roads through very fast curves to get any benefit from downforce, and over a hundred miles an hour going straight on the freeway the drag would be fighting that supercharger and winning increasingly with every mile an hour you went faster. Put in simple terms, do you want a parachute that will keep you from going 200 mph? Because that's how you get a parachute that keeps you from going 200 mph (or somewhere in that neighborhood). You need somewhere longer than an airport runway to figure this out. Find your top speed with the wings, then rip them off, and I bet you gain at least 20 mph...
* Put another way, you couldn't get me on one of those really fast speed boats. Constructive interference is when two waves merge to double their height, the speedboat hits it, air gets under it at speed, and the pilot finds himself doing backflips really really unpleasantly. Other than Bonneville I would not want those wings on a bike I was going over 150 on...
