sac98281
Registered
You know how the normal rider never gets to the edge of the front tire? Well this must be attributed to the front tires height to width ratio; 120/70.
However the rear tire's height to width ratio is much lower (50 to 55). To my understanding, the front will have a larger percentage of contact with the pavement in a tight corner because of the higher ratio.
My question: Is this a safety factor built in so that the rear tire will lose traction before the front? Because the majority of the time, a front slide is unrecoverable. Why do we have fat rear tires that don't match the profile of the front. Wouldn't a matching profile make the bike more stable?
.
.
.
.
However the rear tire's height to width ratio is much lower (50 to 55). To my understanding, the front will have a larger percentage of contact with the pavement in a tight corner because of the higher ratio.
My question: Is this a safety factor built in so that the rear tire will lose traction before the front? Because the majority of the time, a front slide is unrecoverable. Why do we have fat rear tires that don't match the profile of the front. Wouldn't a matching profile make the bike more stable?
.
.
.
.