Spank me hard

EAKbusa

Registered
Joined
Aug 11, 2003
Messages
780
Reaction score
0
Holy crap, did you say 298 ft/lbs of torque? That is insane, triple stock numbers. The 315HP is impressive enough but geez, how can the drivetrain handle that much torque?

Steve K

Donating Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2003
Messages
62
Reaction score
2
>>I passed a car from 70mph and in one car lenght I was doing 146mph.

Hey?
If the car was 15 feet long, that's pulling an impossible 7.67 G

Was it a s-t-r-e-t-c-h-e-d  limo?

STUNNAH

THE "STUNGUN" IS BACK!&#33
Donating Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2002
Messages
5,716
Reaction score
0
Nuh said...Ninja you are the man...I don't think you can slow down long enough to be spanked...So we'll get ya while your off the bike refueling or something... :biggrin:

RaiderDm

Registered
Joined
Feb 21, 2002
Messages
1,452
Reaction score
12
<span style='color:green'></span>NE, you forgot one important spec...
MPG now equals 17 gallons per mile. :tounge:

Seriously tho...Thats pretty damn awesome! :bowdown:

But remember, no matter how fast you go....
there is always someone.....
Slower!

Any more power and you are going to have too get a speedo that shows your MACH #    :thumbsup:     :biggrin:



<!--EDIT|RaiderDm
Reason for Edit: None given...|1066859952 -->

RaiderDm

Registered
Joined
Feb 21, 2002
Messages
1,452
Reaction score
12
<span style='color:green'>One does wonder tho, Does NE hear a voice with a scots accent saying,
" She's givin' all she's got Captain, she cain't give no more!"</span>


:biggrin:  :cool:  
pirate.gif

The Oracle

Registered
Joined
Apr 9, 2003
Messages
2,319
Reaction score
4
After hearing Steve K's response, I did a little calculating of my own...  I was a rocket scientist in my previous life...

NE started at 70mph, next to a car. Lets assume that the car is very long, 20 feet long. He then accelerated (lets assume at a constant acceleration for simplicities sake) up to 146mph. Therefore his average speed was ((70 + 146)/2 = 216/2 =) 108 mph. His relative average speed then is (108 - 70 =) 38 mph.  At 38mph (38(miles/hour) * 5280(feet/mile) = 200640(feet/hour) = 200640(feet/hour) / (3600sec./hour) = 55.7 feet/sec.), he would travel the length of the car (20 feet) in (20 feet / 55.7 feet/sec = .359 seconds).  So Ninja Eater is saying that he can accelerate from 70 to 146 in just over a 1/3 of a second!  At that rate, he could accelerate from 0 to 228 mph ( = 335 feet/second) in one second. That is over 10 Gs (1G = 32 feet/sec/sec).

Don't get me wrong, 330HP on a 550lbs bike is insane, and much faster than anything I've ever seen, but this example may be a hair embellished.

-Rip



<!--EDIT|The Oracle
Reason for Edit: "recalc"|1066858872 -->

MET

The Watcher
Registered
Joined
Feb 17, 2002
Messages
11,207
Reaction score
15
uh, dang...  That is pretty awesome dude!  I gotta come up there next Spring/Summer and see what that looks like next to a NA busa.

And, I can bring the video camera to show the others...

-Rip
That would be great. Maybe even meeting in the middle sometime...

MET

The Watcher
Registered
Joined
Feb 17, 2002
Messages
11,207
Reaction score
15
Holy crap, did you say 298 ft/lbs of torque? That is insane, triple stock numbers. The 315HP is impressive enough but geez, how can the drivetrain handle that much torque?
Whoops if I said 298 in the Torque. That would be wrong. 198 torque which is still extreme. :biggrin:

MET

The Watcher
Registered
Joined
Feb 17, 2002
Messages
11,207
Reaction score
15
After hearing Steve K's response, I did a little calculating of my own...  I was a rocket scientist in my previous life...

NE started at 70mph, next to a car. Lets assume that the car is very long, 20 feet long. He then accelerated (lets assume at a constant acceleration for simplicities sake) up to 146mph. Therefore his average speed was ((70 + 146)/2 = 216/2 =) 108 mph. His relative average speed then is (108 - 70 =) 38 mph.  At 38mph (38(miles/hour) * 5280(feet/mile) = 200640(feet/hour) = 200640(feet/hour) / (3600sec./hour) = 55.7 feet/sec.), he would travel the length of the car (20 feet) in (20 feet / 55.7 feet/sec = .359 seconds).  So Ninja Eater is saying that he can accelerate from 70 to 146 in just over a 1/3 of a second!  At that rate, he could accelerate from 0 to 228 mph ( = 335 feet/second) in one second. That is over 10 Gs (1G = 32 feet/sec/sec).

Don't get me wrong, 330HP on a 550lbs bike is insane, and much faster than anything I've ever seen, but this example may be a hair embellished.

-Rip
OK OK cut me some slack here in over stating a bit. The point was when i looked at the speedometer after passing i hit 150mph quicker then i ever did on the bike. Yes i would guess that the best time for 200mph would be now about 8/10's of a mile. Thanks for the accurate calculations.

:biggrin: :biggrin: :biggrin:

MET

The Watcher
Registered
Joined
Feb 17, 2002
Messages
11,207
Reaction score
15
Hmmm don't know who hit the 100.000 post.

MET

The Watcher
Registered
Joined
Feb 17, 2002
Messages
11,207
Reaction score
15
Well I got so excited I mis printed some details. I have corrected the errors (well most) that I made. I am hoping to open this puppy up as soon as the rooads dry in a couple of days. I may have to put in a new O2 sensor for the Halmeter though. All indications show I am running rich (the way I want to) but Halmeter shows lean. May have burned it out when I used Cam2. :tounge:

Revlis

Re-Recycled, Busa-Less...
Donating Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2003
Messages
15,174
Reaction score
33
After hearing Steve K's response, I did a little calculating of my own...  I was a rocket scientist in my previous life...

NE started at 70mph, next to a car. Lets assume that the car is very long, 20 feet long. He then accelerated (lets assume at a constant acceleration for simplicities sake) up to 146mph. Therefore his average speed was ((70 + 146)/2 = 216/2 =) 108 mph. His relative average speed then is (108 - 70 =) 38 mph.  At 38mph (38(miles/hour) * 5280(feet/mile) = 200640(feet/hour) = 200640(feet/hour) / (3600sec./hour) = 55.7 feet/sec.), he would travel the length of the car (20 feet) in (20 feet / 55.7 feet/sec = .359 seconds).  So Ninja Eater is saying that he can accelerate from 70 to 146 in just over a 1/3 of a second!  At that rate, he could accelerate from 0 to 228 mph ( = 335 feet/second) in one second. That is over 10 Gs (1G = 32 feet/sec/sec).

Don't get me wrong, 330HP on a 550lbs bike is insane, and much faster than anything I've ever seen, but this example may be a hair embellished.

-Rip
OK OK cut me some slack here in over stating a bit.  The point was when i looked at the speedometer after passing i hit 150mph quicker then i ever did on the bike.  Yes i would guess that the best time for 200mph would be now about 8/10's of a mile.  Thanks for the accurate calculations.

:biggrin: :biggrin: :biggrin:
Actually if Oracle did his math based on change in speed and we assume that the car is not accelerating then his math is correct. Because the car is the origin of a stable coordinate system relative to the starting point of the bikes acceleration.

Basically, what I'm saying is that because they were traveling at the same initial velocity the speed of the car does not matter so long as it's velocity remains the same.

Revlis

Re-Recycled, Busa-Less...
Donating Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2003
Messages
15,174
Reaction score
33
I am still 100% certain I do NOT want a Turbo....

gararnett

Registered
Joined
Feb 18, 2002
Messages
328
Reaction score
0
KILLER N.E. !!!!!!!
I know what you mean as far as the I looked down and stuff, right after passing. When you're at the helm of the Busa, ya don't have Mr. Spock there collecting data, and ya got Capt. Kirk's delayed reaction. So the times will always be off, but the reality is that no matter what, that's one awesome rocket you have put together!!!!

The Oracle

Registered
Joined
Apr 9, 2003
Messages
2,319
Reaction score
4
After hearing Steve K's response, I did a little calculating of my own...  I was a rocket scientist in my previous life...

NE started at 70mph, next to a car. Lets assume that the car is very long, 20 feet long. He then accelerated (lets assume at a constant acceleration for simplicities sake) up to 146mph. Therefore his average speed was ((70 + 146)/2 = 216/2 =) 108 mph. His relative average speed then is (108 - 70 =) 38 mph.  At 38mph (38(miles/hour) * 5280(feet/mile) = 200640(feet/hour) = 200640(feet/hour) / (3600sec./hour) = 55.7 feet/sec.), he would travel the length of the car (20 feet) in (20 feet / 55.7 feet/sec = .359 seconds).  So Ninja Eater is saying that he can accelerate from 70 to 146 in just over a 1/3 of a second!  At that rate, he could accelerate from 0 to 228 mph ( = 335 feet/second) in one second. That is over 10 Gs (1G = 32 feet/sec/sec).

Don't get me wrong, 330HP on a 550lbs bike is insane, and much faster than anything I've ever seen, but this example may be a hair embellished.

-Rip
OK OK cut me some slack here in over stating a bit.  The point was when i looked at the speedometer after passing i hit 150mph quicker then i ever did on the bike.  Yes i would guess that the best time for 200mph would be now about 8/10's of a mile.  Thanks for the accurate calculations.

:biggrin: :biggrin: :biggrin:
Actually if Oracle did his math based on change in speed and we assume that the car is not accelerating then his math is correct.  Because the car is the origin of a stable coordinate system relative to the starting point of the bikes acceleration.

Basically, what I'm saying is that because they were traveling at the same initial velocity the speed of the car does not matter so long as it's velocity remains the same.
precisely my friend.
Back
Top