Anyone see this as Ironic

Goatkart

Registered
Joined
Dec 26, 2009
Messages
1,366
Reaction score
3
uhhhhhhhhhhh huh.

its sad but im seriously not even kidding!!


playboy was always a bit to tame and "girl next doorish" for me...


not my tastes at all...


However, many major authors have all written for playboy... (im a book worm at heart)

Aurthur C. Clark
Ian Flemming
Nabokov
Hunter S. Thompson
Updike

and on and on and on...

and they had good jokes n cartoons...

Vonderbach

Your AD here!
Donating Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2009
Messages
2,700
Reaction score
8
another important detail many people ignore is... this is not exactly superman or james bond xray specs... they arent looking at your body sans clothing and seeing your boobs and other bits just dangling willy nilly...

even the ones that have people in an uproar give detailed sihloettes of the body...

the more politically correct versions of the scanners merely show a cartoonish body and illicit "glowing spots" basically red blinking areas when there is an object detected...

Ummm, I think there's some newer technology out there that's a bit more detailed. I see some very distinct "assets" on this young lady.

Maybe NSFW http://drudgereport.com/sscan.jpg

djsin

Lily's Daddy
Registered
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
5,545
Reaction score
29
i used to have a night vision sony camera that we could see through most white clothing...:whistle:

Goatkart

Registered
Joined
Dec 26, 2009
Messages
1,366
Reaction score
3
Ummm, I think there's some newer technology out there that's a bit more detailed. I see some very distinct "assets" on this young lady.

Maybe NSFW http://drudgereport.com/sscan.jpg

Being that its from the drudgereport i automatically have to take it with a bit of skepticism.... Not saying its a faked image(though i could make that exact image quite easily with a hand held P&S camera) however.... more commonly these are the images i have seen of the scanning photos...

**ALSO possibly NSFW**

http://www.projo.com/blogs/shenews/photos/rapi_scan_lg.jpg
http://www.dvorak.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/tsa-body-scan.jpg
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/brainiac/airport_xray_scanner.jpg



now, im not saying people should feel comfortable with the images, or that everyone should feel comfortable...

but i personally dont find them too bad...

given the choice of the plane that has all passengers body scanned (including myself) or the plane which has old techniques and technology..


ill take the body scan plane every time...



i tried to find a picture of the alternate image body scanner but i couldnt find it...

basically its a plain looking body template, which just alerts areas where items are detected...


besides just think how the TSA feels... they gotta LOOK at these images...

they dont wanna look at granny any more than you wanna show em hehehe

BIG GUY

Registered
Joined
Dec 19, 2008
Messages
4,332
Reaction score
6
If it keeps me safe while flying then so be it!

afterhours

Registered
Joined
Jul 2, 2008
Messages
2,113
Reaction score
8
reminds me of the gym......

the only ones worried about being watched, are the ones nobody want to look at.

its high time we start taking security seriously.

PS: while some may have some hangups about p0rn, and the p0rn industry. it must be said that the p0rn Industry is on frontline in the war against censorship and issues dealing with the 1st ammendment.

GA_boi

Donating Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2008
Messages
940
Reaction score
2
Robin Leech put things into perspective for me. Just yesteday in an ethics class I said that I have no problem with the screening because im not giving anything up for them looking at me to see if I had a bomb. Leech makes a valid point. Profile people and put them through the machine. AND.....if people had been doing their job right before this last idiot got on a plane and lit his n u t s on fire then we wouldn't even be asking if the imaging was an invasion of privacy because they wouldn't be doing it!!!!

IF THE LAWS WE HAVE ARE ENFORCED PROPERLY WE WOULDNT HAVE THESE KNEE JERK REACTIONS TO EVERYTHING THAT HAPPENS.

WE ARE AT WAR AND SHOULD FIGHT THAT WAR OVER SEAS AND HERE AT HOME!!! Not be politically correct about a 25 yr old male with a one way ticket from a country that breeds terrorism, whether it be from Pakistan or Mozambique!!:rant:

Dino

VERITAS - AEQUITAS
Donating Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2007
Messages
5,558
Reaction score
20
Robin Leech put things into perspective for me. Just yesteday in an ethics class I said that I have no problem with the screening because im not giving anything up for them looking at me to see if I had a bomb. Leech makes a valid point. Profile people and put them through the machine. AND.....if people had been doing their job right before this last idiot got on a plane and lit his n u t s on fire then we wouldn't even be asking if the imaging was an invasion of privacy because they wouldn't be doing it!!!!

IF THE LAWS WE HAVE ARE ENFORCED PROPERLY WE WOULDNT HAVE THESE KNEE JERK REACTIONS TO EVERYTHING THAT HAPPENS.

WE ARE AT WAR AND SHOULD FIGHT THAT WAR OVER SEAS AND HERE AT HOME!!! Not be politically correct about a 25 yr old male with a one way ticket from a country that breeds terrorism, whether it be from Pakistan or Mozambique!!:rant:

Only problem with this is that he did not break any of OUR laws when he boarded the plane in Amsterdam.

GA_boi

Donating Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2008
Messages
940
Reaction score
2
Nope he didnt but the facts are that this guy should have never been allowed on any plane flying anywhere. There were security breakdowns all over the place.

Dozerdriver

Registered
Joined
Jul 28, 2008
Messages
1,955
Reaction score
27
They need to do something better then what is in place now... just heard some guy took shotgun shells onboard with his carry on. It will take another major attack before we can all agree we aren't doing enough. It is funny they interviewed p0rn stars...:laugh:

Fastfrog007

Donating Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
13,096
Reaction score
48
So yesterday we are up in arms about INTERPOL getting full diplomatic status but think it is ok to give up a right to privacy?

Having p0rn stars is simply for ratings. It is stupid but effective for drawing viewers.

I watched it, twice:whistle:

dadofthree

Seasoned Beef
Donating Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
60,244
Reaction score
2,854
We had a discussion about this very topic in the office yesterday. I dont care one way or another, if it helps keep me alive on the plane......

You can always tell who the bank walkers are :laugh: As far as me; I'll be mistaken for a female :whistle:

Dino

VERITAS - AEQUITAS
Donating Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2007
Messages
5,558
Reaction score
20
They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.

Flicka

Professional Booga Flicka
Moderator
Joined
Feb 18, 2009
Messages
7,078
Reaction score
65
i used to have a night vision sony camera that we could see through most white clothing...:whistle:

Yeah, that was a surprise... Mine's still around here somewhere. :laugh:

Only problem with this is that he did not break any of OUR laws when he boarded the plane in Amsterdam.

Maybe he should have been immediately removed from the plane when they crossed into US airspace... :whistle:
Back
Top