Kevin Jones
Registered
I have done my research, determined that had I gone that route to begin with, I could have avoided some of the things which it seems I purchased to deal with problems that could have been handled by that device. IE, wheelbase. I could have stayed swb with it set up properly $, even on the track. Which means I could have stuck with the stock shock $ Which means I could have avoided a tiger tail, etc. Its all water under the bridge but I am willing to accept that a boost controller is a tool that I need even though my bike must function on the street as well. I do have some questions though.
According to IDBL rules, a "electronic two step" precludes you from certain classes although the terminology of the rules doesnt specify. Can a boost controller keep you from running in certain classes where turbos are legal?
Also, is the datalogging in the AMS any good as opposed to the logboxpro I already have? Of course the provided map sensor with the AMS is going to be spot on which is one of the problems I have been having with the LBP, calibration. The LBP does not calibrate easily with the gen 1. It is a battle. Quicksilver and I were just talking about this and the frustrations.
Can you tell me your experience, would you have upgraded/gone with another brand?
According to IDBL rules, a "electronic two step" precludes you from certain classes although the terminology of the rules doesnt specify. Can a boost controller keep you from running in certain classes where turbos are legal?
Also, is the datalogging in the AMS any good as opposed to the logboxpro I already have? Of course the provided map sensor with the AMS is going to be spot on which is one of the problems I have been having with the LBP, calibration. The LBP does not calibrate easily with the gen 1. It is a battle. Quicksilver and I were just talking about this and the frustrations.
Can you tell me your experience, would you have upgraded/gone with another brand?