I don't think so. If we were tracking the chemical weapons deployment systems, that would be cause for an immediate JDAM. But we don't HAVE that intel yet, so an immediate strike would do nothing BUT inflame EVERYBODY. If evidence exists, it will create time to build a consensus. Because it's not the weapons we are going to bomb, it's going to hopefully be whatever camel Assad happens to be hiding under at the time. I suspect the #1 target to track at the moment is ASSAD himself; NOT the weapons. Now, if we get intel that it's about to happen again, and can pinpoint the weapons, Weapons free.....
Edit: In fact, if he'd HAD that intel, I'd have fired missile first, notified Congress afterwards. But he didn't. This isn't a precision strike to take out a single target, but a more general military action to 'punish' Assad for using these weapons. So, they don't HAVE a single target at the moment....
I'll bet the Israelis know if/where they are....
The Pentagon constantly updates military options for the White House. But Gen Dempsey's comments were the clearest yet that it is deliberating a direct intervention into the bloody conflict.
Those options would include missile strikes on key regime infrastructure, including chemical weapons sites, imposing no-fly zones or a ground invasion. Another course of action would be drone attacks against rebels linked to al-Qaeda if the administration decided to strike on both sides of the conflict.
first off Israel is an ally of ours Syria is not. second, Israel does a lot for our country Syria does nothing. I agree that we shud stay the hell out of Syria but if someone attacks Israel you can bet that we will defend them as we shud!One more time we are being drawn into a conflict to secure Israel.
How much more money and American blood are we willing to give for them?
Let Syria be and let them take care of itself and let the same be done for Israel.
I'm so tired of havin to fear things that do not threaten USA at all.
US 'considering military force in Syria' - Telegraph
Quoted from Gen Dempseys plan:
Sheer lunacy we think about when we speak of attacking both sides?
Wtf are we thinking?
lmao Saiid. its internet shrthand so try to keep up bud. again, we have a great interest in the safety and security of Israel. we only have 6 ally's in the middle east Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Afghanistan, Israel, Kuwait, and Morocco. it behooves us protect Israel even if ppl like you dont care for the jews.Keith, no I never was for intervention. Only a solution formed by the Syrians themselves.
DaCol for sure the rebels are responsible for heinous acts same as Assad. Very same folks we fought in Afg we now move to support in Syria. It makes no sense?
Brett at no point ever did I compare Syria to Israel? Simply said I'm tired of USA foreign policy in the area being dictated by Israeli needs and interests.
The word is SHOULD not Shud? The more I read from you the more I seriously doubt you are in any professional position.
It is impossible for me to imagine what one of your reports read like?