Radar Detector and Puig Dark Smoke Windshield

FloydV

Donating Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2005
Messages
1,943
Reaction score
3
Do you guys think that a dark smoke Puig wind screen interferes with radar reception?

Floyd

RedBusarider

Registered
Joined
Jun 12, 2008
Messages
2,530
Reaction score
358
Radar goes right thru your body so it can even detect radar from behind. :laugh::laugh::laugh:

880jedi

Registered
Joined
Nov 29, 2010
Messages
917
Reaction score
45
I have a dark Zero Gravity and my detector (Adaptiv) works fine. :thumbsup:

GNBRETT

Registered
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
5,314
Reaction score
295
as long as the tint is not metallic then it have no effect on the functionality of the radar detector thru a smoked shield

FloydV

Donating Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2005
Messages
1,943
Reaction score
3
Thanks guys. Up close to the screen is an excellent mounting position.

StrtRac3r

Registered
Joined
Feb 3, 2011
Messages
1,599
Reaction score
26
Sooo now that the radar is solved.... :hijack: anyone ever checked out the laser jammers?

FloydV

Donating Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2005
Messages
1,943
Reaction score
3
Sooo now that the radar is solved.... :hijack: anyone ever checked out the laser jammers?

Not yet. I know radar jammers are illegal, and involve FCC regs, and possible high fines. Never heard of laser jammers being illegal. If they work, that would be great. I've never encountered any cops using lidar. I think the problem is that they are useless past 300 yards (maybe it was feet), because they have to be low powered enough to not scorch peoples retinas per FCC. Same thing for laser aiming systems on weapons. That makes them questionable to me, because aiming with a 500 miliwatt beam would be hard to see in daylight. Military weapons probably don't fall under the same rules.

Also, lidar has a really small beam at any useable range. Still, the idea of jamming lidar makes the idea attractive. "Radar Roy" pitches stealth coatings for the front hot spots on a vehicle. I'd like to see a real world test of this. If it looks anything like military stealth coatings, it would be fugly.

In radar there are X, K, Ka, and Ku. I've never heard of how well Ku band works, but Escort doesn't detect it, while Valentine One claims to. There is also POP radar which I can find very little info on.

The locals in Idaho mostly don't use radar detectors, so cops leave their radar on most of the time. That makes them light up on radar detectors from a long way away. The people here also drive maddeningly slow. I often find myself driving between two lanes of cars going in the same direction just to get out of second or third gear.

They act like automatons righteous in their obedience of traffic laws. Sometimes two or more vehicles will decide to enforce the law by slowing traffic behind them. I've found the trick is to find the right gear and hammer the throttle so that they don't have time to drift into that phantom lane. When I pass my wife like this, she says it has a buffeting effect, like the wake of a missle. I never have time to pay attention to their faces, but I can imagine the indignation.

Anyway, in helmet peripheral radar warning is the way to go. You never have to take your eyes off the road, which is a good thing.

Anyone prefer Valentine, Escort, or Bell over other brands? They can't offer 100% protection, but just one ticket will pay for them IMHO.

Floyd
Back
Top