Pairing TB's for Vacuum

65Cobra

Registered
After my issue with a fluctuating vacuum tester, I wanted to learn more since part of my problem with my turbo Busa this summer had to do with the vacuum connections. After some searching and reading, I came up with the following since I'm interested in making a few changes. I certainly hope the following is correct so please let me know and feel free to add to this...

Vacuum at any given cylinder is only created during the intake stroke, or once every 4-strokes, which explains the wild fluctuation after connecting the vacuum tester to just one TB.... one stroke with vacuum followed by three strokes without vacuum. Using all four throttle bodies smoothed out the response since there was always one cylinder providing vacuum.

Apparently using vacuum ports from any two TB's won't necessarily give the same results... for example, pairing TB's 1&2 can have a different effect than pairing TB's 2&3. I'm sure someone else can explain this better than me... and feel free to do so...

During one intake cycle, using the vacuum ports from TB's 1&2 will provide vacuum during two consecutive intake strokes on Cylinders 1&2, but not during the next two consecutive intake strokes on Cylinders 4&3. The same principle would hold true using TB's 2&4, 1&3 or 3&4.

However, using the vacuum ports from TB's 2&3 will provide vacuum during alternating intake strokes... Cylinder 1 (none), Cylinder 2 (vacuum), Cylinder 4 (none), Cylinder 3 (vacuum). The same would hold true using TB's 1&3.

Compared to using vacuum from any one TB, I'd guess the first scenario would provide a stronger vacuum but the second secnario would provide a smoother vacuum response which could effect which TB's you would want to use in a given situation.
 
Each cylinder will create vacuum on each of their intake strokes, I am really unsure of what your statement really refers to, but if you are making conclusions based on your engine it sure sounds like something is wrong.

The reason you see different effects is due to the firing order of the engine, which is 1 2 4 3, so your example does not make sense, 1&2 and 4&3 should produce the same results.

Richard
 
Last edited:
You're right, using 1&2 as a vacuum source would produce the same results as using 4&3. That paragraph isn't really saying otherwise but the wording is confusing... too late to edit though.

On the other hand, using 1&2 as a vacuum source would NOT produce the same results as using 2&3, which may or may not matter depending on how sensitive or critical the device being operated is.
 
Back
Top