If you care about the future of the United States - please have a look

Killing America Slowly, Chapter 40

From the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
Killing America Slowly


CHAPTER 40

Ease of voting during elections


Once CAP system is implemented, nothing prevents us from using the system as part of regular election process. A new set of screens would allow to cast a vote for one candidate or another. An illustration of such screen for the United States Presidential Election is shown in Fig. 5. You would be able to vote for any candidate by selecting a respective check mark. Overall vote is shown in columns 4 and 5 for voter convenience.



KAS_Fig5_smaller.jpg




Detailed view provides individual votes as illustrated in Fig. 6. Note that the third row in Fig. 6 corresponds to the vote in Fig. 5 because the same CAP ID is indicated.


KAS_Fig6_smaller.jpg
 
Killing America Slowly, Chapter 41

From the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
Killing America Slowly


CHAPTER 41

Passive and Active use of CAP by elected public officials


Elected public officials don't need to do anything special in order for CAP to function. Continuous Approval Process is happening regardless of their action or inaction. They are simply taking advantage of the system, able to view and analyze votes and comments of other people, and adjust their actions accordingly. This signifies the passive role of elected public officials.

However, an elected official can actively utilize CAP to their advantage. Let's say a politician wants to propose a new legislation, or considers taking a certain action. The proposal could be entered into CAP system enabling voters to cast their approval or a disapproval of such proposal. This way a politician would get an immediate feedback regarding the proposal, and without actually going forward with it.

Such amazing interaction between people and their governments would allow governments to make informed decisions, and fine tune them based on people's feedback. Shown below is an illustration of such proposal. Voting is shown in Fig. 7, and the detailed view of the votes is shown in Fig. 8.


KAS_Fig7_smaller.jpg




KAS_Fig8_smaller.jpg
 
Killing America Slowly, Chapter 42

From the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
Killing America Slowly


CHAPTER 42

Little brother is watching, too


For years and generations, many people were concerned regarding government's intrusion into our private lives. Advances in technology made it very easy for the governments to monitor what people do every day. There wasn't much people could do – but mostly complain about it.

Having full control over their governments, people can easily change that. People can also demand and achieve the ability to continuously monitor what their governments and elected officials are doing on a daily basis. Don't you ever forget – those governments and elected officials work for you. It is your right to know what it is they are doing every minute of the day. If they don't like it, they are free to leave.
 
Killing America Slowly, Chapter 43

From the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
Killing America Slowly


CHAPTER 43

Proposed Amendment to the Constitution of the United States


Although text below is too detailed to become Constitutional Amendment as presented, it carries the spirit of intent in a precise and deliberate manner so as to be helpful in the future.

Continuous Approval Process (CAP) Including the Ability to Remove an Elected Public Official

1. At any time, every voter should be able to cast their vote of approval or a disapproval along with optional comment for every pertinent federal, state, and local elected official. This is to be achieved by developing, implementing, and maintaining a nationwide computerized system widely available to everyone as set forth below.

2. If a disapproval of an elected official reaches at least 70% at any time, a separate removal vote is held for a period of 7 days regarding whether to remove such elected official, and if this removal vote reaches at least 67% at the end of the 7 day period, such elected official is removed from his/her office. If the removal vote does not reach at least 67%, an elected official remains in his/her capacity, and during the following 7 days waiting period no removal vote may be held regarding such elected official unless during that period the disapproval reaches at least 75%.

3. Every voter has to initially register with any one participating bank of their choice in order to participate in CAP, but preferably with the bank where they already have an account – in order to create a lesser burden for participating banks. At the time of registration, a voter is automatically assigned a random and unique 12 digit CAP ID which is only known to a voter and the issuing bank. No two voters can have the same CAP ID. No bank employee should be able to view a voter's CAP ID during the normal course of duties related to CAP functionality.

4. Every participating bank has to facilitate Internet browser, mobile devices, and cash machine (bank-o-mat) interfaces which would allow a voter to securely cast their vote as well as to enter their optional comments where letter keys are available.

5. Every bank has to immediately or as soon as possible transmit voting information to all participating Internet Service Providers (ISPs) for aggregation. The information transmitted by banks does not include any identifying information such as names, addresses, and exact age. However, it does include the name of an elected official, the type of vote such as approval vote or removal vote, and the following non-identifying information regarding a voter: voter's CAP ID and issuing bank; the vote; optional comments with maximum allowed number of characters of no less than 500; voter's gender; voter's age range as one of the ranges 18-20, 21-25, 26-30, 31-35, and so on with 5 year ranges; voter's general geographic area specified by 5 digit zip code, town, county, and state.

6. Participating ISPs have to facilitate Internet browser and mobile device interfaces as follows:

a) Anyone is able to view and download detailed votes of others at any time which includes the name of an elected official, the type of vote, and the following information for every voter: voter's CAP ID and issuing bank; the vote; optional comments with maximum number of characters of no less than 500; voter's gender; voter's age range as one of the ranges 18-20, 21-25, 26-30, 31-35, and so on with 5 year ranges; voter's general geographic area specified by zip code, town, county, and state.

b) Anyone is able to view and download total votes as absolute numbers and as percentages.

7. Every participating bank has to facilitate Internet browser, mobile device, and cash machine (bank-o-mat) interfaces which would allow anyone to verify the legitimacy of any CAP ID or a bulk of CAP IDs (for Internet interface only), and view the non-identifying information mentioned above which includes voter's CAP ID, voter's gender, voter's age range, and voter's general geographic area.

8. A number of banks (a minimum of three) are selected to participate in CAP in order to cover the entire area of the United States, and in order to make it convenient for all voters to be able to reach cash machines (bank-o-mats) within reasonable distance from their residences. A minimum of three reputable ISPs are selected to participate in CAP. All participating banks and ISPs have to be compensated fairly by the newly established CAP Tax with individual tax rate not exceeding 0.1% of adjustable gross income.

9. Participating banks must guard, and actively protect identity of voters and their identifying information such as names, addresses, and exact age in the same way banks protect their customer information.

10. In a continuous and fully automated fashion, participating ISPs have to compare their voting records with the respective issuing banks in order to verify that such information is consistent. If a discrepancy is discovered:

a) An automated formal notification is issued to the issuing bank, to all ISPs, to a respective government monitoring agency, and to respective public monitoring entities.

b) An investigation is conducted in order to either identify and fix a technological shortcoming, or to identify and prosecute persons or entities who fraudulently altered voting information.

11. In a continuous and fully automated fashion, participating banks have to compare their voting records with all participating ISPs in order to verify that such information is consistent. If a discrepancy is discovered:

a) An automated formal notification is issued to the issuing bank, to all participating ISPs, to a respective government monitoring agency, and to respective public monitoring entities.

b) An investigation is conducted in order to either identify and fix a technological shortcoming, or to identify and prosecute persons or entities who fraudulently altered voting information.

12. In a continuous and fully automated fashion, participating banks mail verification letters and send emails to newly registered as well as to randomly selected voters asking them to validate and confirm accuracy of voter information. If an invalid, fake, or otherwise suspicious voting registration is discovered:

a) Issuing bank reports a discrepancy to all participating ISPs, to a respective government monitoring agency, and to respective public monitoring entities.

b) An investigation is conducted in order to either identify and fix a technological shortcoming, or to identify and prosecute persons or entities who fraudulently altered voting information.

13. Except as described above, no voter information maintained by participating banks should be accessible to anyone including any government agency. If anyone attempts to gain access to such information, a respective participating bank issues notification to all participating ISPs, to a respective government monitoring agency, and to respective public monitoring entities; persons or entities attempting to gain access are identified and prosecuted.

14. Except as described above, no participating bank should share voter information with any other entity.

15. Any type of fraud or intent to influence the outcome of CAP in any way should be punishable as a crime against democracy.

16. As new technologies and devices emerge, and become widely used – every participating bank and ISP has to facilitate the new interfaces for the functionalities described above.

17. Future changes to the Constitution should be consistent with the spirit and intent of Continuous Approval Process.
 
Killing America Slowly, Chapter 44

From the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
Killing America Slowly


CHAPTER 44

How to prevent future crisis


It is important to reflect on the past in order to avoid repeating the same mistakes. Why for years and generations the United States was being subjected to gradual governmental decay, in turn leading to gradual decay of the entire country? The main causes were human nature of those in power coupled with the absence of people's full and continuous control over their governments.

What was the main mechanism used by the governments to spread and maintain its influence and power? This was achieved by winning votes of lower income people. These votes were won by lies, deception, false promises, and false hope.

Implementing CAP would make it a lot harder for any elected government official to lie and deceive. However, the long term danger still remains. Over time, politicians of the future will find ways to take lies and deception to a new level. CAP will not be as effective in such new circumstances.

The only way to avoid the repeat of the past is to make it very difficult for future politicians to be able to corrupt and bribe lower income voters. But how to achieve this?

Very simple! Those who contribute less to society should have a lesser say when it comes to decisions affecting society affairs. This means that such people will have a lesser vote during elections. As a result, those who contribute less to society cannot be bribed by the governments as easily.

Before you explode in anger, before you throw your hands up in the air, before you start cursing, before you reach for your gun, and before you start sharing your outrage with your friends – please consider the following important points.

Chapter “Ethical Aspect of Moneyâ€￾ explains that money is nothing more than a tool. It is not a product in itself. When someone provides a product or a service to society, a money record is created which represents the value of how much of a product or a service was provided. In return, that someone can request from society other products and services equal in value to their prior contribution. The money record is first and foremost an indication of how much someone contributed to society. Politicians hide this simple truth instead of promoting it, and for a good reason. On one hand, they want to instill the idea that those who contribute more to society are some sort of crooks who managed to make more money. On the other hand, they want to portray themselves as friends of poor people in order to win their votes.

Precisely to avoid such manipulation, it is only reasonable to slightly increase voting power of those who contribute more to society, while at the same time slightly decreasing voting power of those who contribute less to society.

Consider a self sustaining small village far away from other life centers. Carpenter Carter fixes houses. Milkman Miller supplies milk, cheese, and meat. Farmer Farrell grows corn, wheat, and vegetables. However helper Harry helps here and there, but doesn't contribute to the village as much as others. Because of that, helper Harry has a lesser voice in village affairs. This makes perfect sense, and it does not occur to anyone in the village to dispute that. Why should it be different on a larger scale?

From a different angle, if someone is hiding their income, they may have a lesser vote. This creates motivation to disclose their income in order to have higher voting power.

If someone contributes little to society, they may have less of a vote. This creates motivation to contribute more to society in order to have higher voting power.
A rich person sitting on his or her fortune would contribute nothing or little to society and therefore such rich person would have a lesser vote than a working person.

Also, keep in mind that everyone's voting power will be confidential in the same way as everyone's income is.

Based on 2010 personal income distribution in the United States, bottom third contributors to society earned under $18,500. Middle third earned between $18,500 and $42,500. Upper third of contributors to society earned above $42,500. These numbers are approximate, but very revealing. Clearly, bottom third consists of people who are very poor. How to make those people more prosperous? There is only one way – those people have to contribute more to society. And the only way to achieve this is to first, be honest about it and clarify that there is no easy way out. Second, promote hard work, education, qualification, and entrepreneurship.

Those politicians who lie to poor people, deceive them, and bribe them in order to win their votes are doing a great disservice to poor people. Such politicians create an illusion of improvement for poor people, but in reality poor people stay poor and getting poorer.
In the end, such politicians use the support and votes of poor people to stay in power and to promote their agendas while at the same time ensuring decay of our society.

I realize that such approach creates many questions, particularly what criteria determines assignment of voting power. I would not even attempt to suggest such criteria, but wanted to spark a debate on this very important long term challenge. One thing is clear – we have to do something to prevent politicians of the future from using, corrupting, and misleading the most vulnerable third of working people in order to gain political power, while at the same time encouraging poor people to do nothing truly productive in order to improve their circumstances.

I challenge anyone to come up with a better approach to address this problem. An approach which is practical, fair, and does not rely on utopian assumptions.
 
Killing America Slowly, Chapter 45

From the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
Killing America Slowly


CHAPTER 45

Conclusion


One of the objectives of this book is to show that currently we the people are NOT in full control of our federal, state, and local governments. In fact, we have so little control that we are more like beggars asking and hoping for the governments to do their job right. As we discussed, governments are not evil. There are fundamental reasons the governments behave the way they do. On the one hand, governments consist of humans whose behavior is flawed in many ways. On the other hand, we the people have very little control over them.

Another objective of this book is to show that without any changes in how we control our governments, the shift to socialism is inevitable, in turn leading to gradual loss of freedoms, degradation of quality of life, and to a crisis of unimaginable magnitude which will affect everyone – the middle class, and especially poor people who were duped by the governments into believing, trusting, and supporting them.

The main objective of this book is to show that there is a practical and achievable way for us to regain full and continuous control over our governments by implementing Continuous Approval Process – CAP, which in turn would prevent the aforementioned crisis, will reverse our path off the cliff, and ultimately will benefit our entire nation and all of us individually. As was pointed out, there is a lot of work to be done. Despite being challenging and time consuming, it is a worthwhile effort in the long run.

The more subtle but important benefit of CAP is providing continuous two way communication between people and their governments so that the governments are able to adjust their actions based on continuous feedback from the people, while at the same time communicating with the people and explaining the government's decisions in a clear and understandable language. In all the likelihood, it will rarely come to a point when an elected official needs to be removed. However, the fear of being removed for non-compliance with the will of the people would assure that governments truly serve our interests.

Many of us are frustrated with our governments. The overall perception is that there isn’t much we can do to really change things for the better. This makes us feel helpless as well as creates a sense of hopelessness. As a result, our participation in political process is sparse, or at best boils down to voting for a candidate we dislike less. Is that what we deserve? The proposed incremental change will give people real power and real control over elected public officials – at any time and with ease. As a result, the previous sense of hopelessness and frustration will be replaced with true hope because practically every eligible voter will participate in Continuous Approval Process, CAP. It will be easy and fun, so why not? A general sense of satisfaction with the governments will promote a more positive and stable attitudes in people. Our society will be a happier place.

People, having new power and control over the governments, will start paying attention to things which they were not noticing in the past. Through the new mechanism – CAP – people will demand meaningful changes, and the governments would have no choice but to adapt and follow the will of the people. Governments will become more efficient, and our taxes will go down across the board. Our nation will become richer.

The many ridiculous things the governments do now which we notice on a daily basis will become the things of the past. Everyone knows that a government does a sloppy job at whatever job needs to be done. This will change for the better.

Note that CAP does not transform our political system to allow the majority to govern and possibly ignore the needs of minorities. CAP simply creates an amazing virtual oversight agency consisting of millions of people who are continuously scrutinizing government actions.

There are many talented and hard working individuals who truly want to serve other people. Currently, such individuals shy away from the political process because it is corrupt and dirty. More often than not, politicians care more about themselves and their careers, and not about people. This will change. A new breed of politicians will emerge – the politicians we would be proud of. They will be the kind of people who will not hesitate to put their careers and lives on the line for other people.

Creating and maintaining CAP on the national scale – an electronic system which would be secure, reliable, and safe for voters – is a challenging, but achievable task as was explained above.

Incremental nature of the proposed changes will allow us to gradually switch to the new process, and easily fall back onto the existing processes if something unpredictable happens. CAP can be implemented using dry run approach. This means that the system gets implemented, but we do not remove elected public officials. Over a period of a few years, we can see how the system works, and as a result of such experience we can fine tune the system as needed. Once we all feel comfortable, CAP system goes live.

CAP has to be implemented on all levels of government – for the federal government as well as for state and local governments. This is because we want all governments to follow the will of the people.

We should always keep in mind a long term perspective, and strive for gradual changes. While there are so many things which we will need to fix, it is impossible to do everything within a short period of time. It is also important to realize that the new changes may negatively affect some people, especially those who work for the governments. When reducing the governmental apparatus, it is important to have a long term plan on how to re-train, educate, and re-employ those people who will no longer be needed in the government.

Gradual changes is key to our success. The mere fact of moving onto this new path will have an enormous positive effect on our society.

If you personally believe that implementing CAP is the right thing to do, then don't let anyone telling you otherwise. Don't even bother arguing with those who oppose CAP – smile at them, and walk away. Talk is cheap. Act! Spread the word among those you know. Call, write, demand, and vote for those candidates who support CAP. This includes your US Senators, your US Representatives as well as your state legislators – because the new Constitutional Amendment needs the votes of two thirds of the Senate, two thirds of the House, and then it needs to be approved by at least 38 states. US Senators, US Representatives, and state legislators who will vote for the Constitutional Amendment to implement CAP – are the politicians of the future! They are the people who will bring new positive meaning to the word 'Politician', and to the expression 'elected public official'.

I appeal to the people of our great country – Act Now! No one will do it for you. Your destiny is truly in your hands.

Good luck to all of us, and God bless America!



About the author

Igor Tohnini is an alias. The author feels that the subject of the book deserves all the attention while he is the one whose name is not important. Igor is a passionate writer, creator, and inventor. He devoted a number of years writing this book, on and off. Igor possesses a unique ability to analyze surrounding world and information on a deep level while at the same time distancing himself from preconceived notions. Sometimes, this leads to discoveries and unpredictable findings. This book is one of them. Igor is not affiliated with any political party or a movement. He is an independent thinker, a common sense guy, and the one who appreciates simple things in life. He has great respect for people in general as well as for nature and for all creatures of this world.
 
Never mind your Civil War
with 600,000 killed or wounded .



Cheers
Ken .








:moon:
18E407FF-4B22-4727-90ED-940666C93348.jpeg

 
Back
Top