Let me tell you a story ....
Going back about three years now, I saw a year 2000 busa advertised real cheap by a dealer, and having been hankering after one for a while, but not wanting to shell out on a new one, decided to buy it and run it for a bit, and if I liked it, trade-up to a new one.
The bike was absolutely brill.
Real smooth power delivery, and a clutch that with a wonderful soft bite point.
So after six months, I traded up to a brand new 2007 model.
But to be honest the new bike has not been as good as the old 'un.
There is a power lurch when closing and re-opening the throttle, vibration as the revs rise, and the clutch is much fiercer, making the overall riding experience not such a pleasure.
While I can't say it's a bad bike, and I have no intention of ditching it, it has dissappointed a little compared to the year 2000 model.
Does anyone else have similar experience of newer v.'s older vintage busa ?
(By new, I still mean pre-2008 model change).
Going back about three years now, I saw a year 2000 busa advertised real cheap by a dealer, and having been hankering after one for a while, but not wanting to shell out on a new one, decided to buy it and run it for a bit, and if I liked it, trade-up to a new one.
The bike was absolutely brill.
Real smooth power delivery, and a clutch that with a wonderful soft bite point.
So after six months, I traded up to a brand new 2007 model.
But to be honest the new bike has not been as good as the old 'un.
There is a power lurch when closing and re-opening the throttle, vibration as the revs rise, and the clutch is much fiercer, making the overall riding experience not such a pleasure.
While I can't say it's a bad bike, and I have no intention of ditching it, it has dissappointed a little compared to the year 2000 model.
Does anyone else have similar experience of newer v.'s older vintage busa ?
(By new, I still mean pre-2008 model change).