Here's an article that illustrates yet another reason why we can't depend on cops. It may also explain the bizarre postings from FakoCop?
BOSTON, Sept. 10 (UPI) - Robert Jordan filed a federal lawsuit three years ago against the police department in New London, Conn., because his application to become a police officer was rejected.
The reason: He was too smart.
The rejection was upheld this week by U.S. District Court Judge Peter Dorsey. He said it was reasonable for the department to reject someone who scores too high on a screening test.
New London Police Chief Bruce Rinehart is hailing that decision. He says in today's Boston Globe that police work, "believe it or not, is a boring job." Rinehart says that "certain people" can't accept being involved in a boring occupation, and "either the day they come in they want to be chief of police, or they become very frustrated and leave."
Jordan, along with some 500 applicants, in 1996 took the so-called Wonderlic screening test, a 12-minute intelligence test that recommends minimum and maximum scoring levels for particular jobs. The acceptable range for police officers was a score between 20 and 27 out of a possible 50 points. Jordan scored 33, well above the
range.
Jordan, 48, of Waterford, who has worked as an insurance salesman, a security guard and at a prison, filed his federal lawsuit in 1997.
He said when he learned his application was rejected, he inquired why and was told, "'We don't like to hire people with too high an IQ to be cops in this town."'
Jordan said a city official told him that there was "nothing more boring than driving around in a police cruiser all day, and no one with any smarts would want to do the job."
It was not immediately known if Jordan would appeal further.