Bosshound
Donating Member
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2007
- Messages
- 4,973
- Reaction score
- 70
I can understand your meaning but I have this feeling that even if all that were able too did evacuate, emergency personnel would still be put in the position of grave danger. Considering the sheer size of IKE and effected areas and the danger, there would still have been a need for brave individuals to check for the ones that couldn't or were unable to leave. No not an excuse for the dummies that decided to stay and surely would only make rescue efforts that much worse. The fact remains rescue or no rescue, brave emergency personnel (bless them) make the decision to face the dangers and put themselves in those positions and then theres no guarantees, without checking things out-how would you ever know for sure. As far as the dummies go-are they to blame for the rescue workers dangers?, do they make it that much worse?,yes. Just let them herd-up on a man-made highway overpass island,someone will get to them eventually..
+1 Believe it or Not...Somepeople Had Nowhere to Go. NO FAMILY, NO FRIENDS.... SH.. Happens I Guess. God Bless our Service People. Cops, Paramedics, Firefighters, Coast Guard, etc



Seriously though, if they had the opportunity to leave and chose to stay I think they should pay for their rescue. I think Colorado does something similar for rescuing mountain climbers etc. But the reality is a lot of them probably would not have the means to pay the bill. I had a similar discussion with my son that is in the Coast Guard about his feelings toward having to rescue people that put themselves in peril by doing dumb things. He said it doesn't matter their goal is to save lives no matter what led to the situation. Here's to the brave men and women that do these jobs 