white is the fastest color theorem

yamanista

Registered
White is the fastest color photon theorem (nevada beach front) . Everyone knows that white reflects photos. The unique hayabusa body work reflects these photons in a rearward direction resulting in extra thrust. I am sorry but you black Hayabusa owner suffer from photon absorption and distortion of body work resulting in increased aerodynamic resistance. :rofl::rofl:
 
Mine's black, that aerodynamic resistance must be what keeps pushin my front wheel up in the air:poke:
 
That's the most definitive answer I've ever heard to the color wars...I'm just glad Orange blurs are not actually considered an actual color or it would be stuck at 198 with white~!~ :laugh:

:welcome: aboard

From assistant chief Smart A~!~ :beerchug:


PS::Your right about the black, that's why I put blue tape across it~!~
 
Last edited:
That's the most definitive answer I've ever heard to the color wars...I'm just glad Orange blurs are not actually considered an actual color or it would be stuck at 198 with white~!~ :laugh:

:welcome: aboard

From assistant chief Smart A~!~ :beerchug:


PS::Your right about the black, that's why I put blue tape across it~!~

I saw your video from Natural Bridge, you goin to New London this Saturday? Sorry to threadjack.
 
I hate to tell you this (especially from someone who really thinks BLUE is the fastest), but the fastest Color is actually RED:

Light travels at a constant speed in vaccum... 3 x 10^8 m/s...
But in media like air, glass, different wavelengths in the electromagnetic spectrum travel at different speeds.
Refractive Index n is inversely proportional to wavelength of light.
But refractive index = Speed of light in Vaccum/Speed of light in medium
Hence, speed of light in media is directly proportional to wavelength...
Since wavelength increases from Violet to Red,
Red travels the fastest...
Violet travels the slowest...

Doppler Shift
Red and blue shifts
Light from moving objects will appear to have different wavelengths depending on the relative motion of the source and the observer.

Observers looking at an object that is moving away from them see light that has a longer wavelength than it had when it was emitted (a redshift), while observers looking at an approaching source see light that is shifted to shorter wavelength (a blueshift).

The schematic diagram below shows a galactic star at the bottom left with its spectrum on the bottom right. The spectrum shows the dark absorption lines first seen by Fraunhofer. These lines can be used to identify the chemical elements in distant stars, but they also tell us the radial velocity. The other three spectra and pictures from bottom to top show a nearby galaxy, a medium distance galaxy, and a distant galaxy. The pictures on the left are negatives, of course, so the brightest parts of the galaxies are black. Notice how the pattern of absorption lines shifts to the red as the galaxies get fainter. The numbers above and below the spectra are the measured wavelengths in nm [nanometers].

In the star which is at rest with respect to us, or in a laboratory standard, the line wavelengths are 393 & 397 nm from Ca II [ionized calcium]; 410, 434, 486 & 656 nm from H I [atomic hydrogen]; 518 nm from Mg I [neutral magnesium]; and 589 nm from Na I [neutral sodium]. By measuring the amount of the shift to the red, we can determine that the bright galaxy is moving away at 3,000 km/sec, which is 1 percent of the speed of light, because its lines are shifted in wavelength by 1 percent to the red. The redshift z is defined such that:
lambda(observed)
1+z = ----------------
lambda(emitted)

which is
397 401 414 438 491 523 595 663
1+z = --- = --- = --- = --- = --- = --- = --- = --- = 1.01
393 397 410 434 486 518 589 656

in this case so z = 0.01 for the bright galaxy. The radial velocity is usually approximated by v(rad) = cz, where c is the speed of light, The medium bright galaxy is moving away at 15,000 km/sec with z = 0.05, while the faintest and most distant galaxy is moving away at 75,000 km/sec with z = 0.25. When z is larger than 1 then cz is faster than the speed of light and, while recession velocities faster than light are allowed, this approximation using cz as the recession velocity of an object is no longer valid. Thus for the largest known redshift of z=6.3, the recession velocity is not 6.3*c = 1,890,000 km/sec. It is also not the 285,254 km/sec given by the special relativistic Doppler formula 1+z = sqrt((1+v/c)/(1-v/c)). The actual recession velocity for this object depends on the cosmological parameters, but for an OmegaM=0.3 vacuum-dominated flat model the velocity is 585,611 km/sec. This is faster than light.

Shamlessly plagarized :moon:
 
I hate to tell you this (especially from someone who really thinks BLUE is the fastest), but the fastest Color is actually RED:

Light travels at a constant speed in vaccum... 3 x 10^8 m/s...
But in media like air, glass, different wavelengths in the electromagnetic spectrum travel at different speeds.
Refractive Index n is inversely proportional to wavelength of light.
But refractive index = Speed of light in Vaccum/Speed of light in medium
Hence, speed of light in media is directly proportional to wavelength...
Since wavelength increases from Violet to Red,
Red travels the fastest...
Violet travels the slowest...

Doppler Shift
Red and blue shifts
Light from moving objects will appear to have different wavelengths depending on the relative motion of the source and the observer.

Observers looking at an object that is moving away from them see light that has a longer wavelength than it had when it was emitted (a redshift), while observers looking at an approaching source see light that is shifted to shorter wavelength (a blueshift).

The schematic diagram below shows a galactic star at the bottom left with its spectrum on the bottom right. The spectrum shows the dark absorption lines first seen by Fraunhofer. These lines can be used to identify the chemical elements in distant stars, but they also tell us the radial velocity. The other three spectra and pictures from bottom to top show a nearby galaxy, a medium distance galaxy, and a distant galaxy. The pictures on the left are negatives, of course, so the brightest parts of the galaxies are black. Notice how the pattern of absorption lines shifts to the red as the galaxies get fainter. The numbers above and below the spectra are the measured wavelengths in nm [nanometers].

In the star which is at rest with respect to us, or in a laboratory standard, the line wavelengths are 393 & 397 nm from Ca II [ionized calcium]; 410, 434, 486 & 656 nm from H I [atomic hydrogen]; 518 nm from Mg I [neutral magnesium]; and 589 nm from Na I [neutral sodium]. By measuring the amount of the shift to the red, we can determine that the bright galaxy is moving away at 3,000 km/sec, which is 1 percent of the speed of light, because its lines are shifted in wavelength by 1 percent to the red. The redshift z is defined such that:
lambda(observed)
1+z = ----------------
lambda(emitted)

which is
397 401 414 438 491 523 595 663
1+z = --- = --- = --- = --- = --- = --- = --- = --- = 1.01
393 397 410 434 486 518 589 656

in this case so z = 0.01 for the bright galaxy. The radial velocity is usually approximated by v(rad) = cz, where c is the speed of light, The medium bright galaxy is moving away at 15,000 km/sec with z = 0.05, while the faintest and most distant galaxy is moving away at 75,000 km/sec with z = 0.25. When z is larger than 1 then cz is faster than the speed of light and, while recession velocities faster than light are allowed, this approximation using cz as the recession velocity of an object is no longer valid. Thus for the largest known redshift of z=6.3, the recession velocity is not 6.3*c = 1,890,000 km/sec. It is also not the 285,254 km/sec given by the special relativistic Doppler formula 1+z = sqrt((1+v/c)/(1-v/c)). The actual recession velocity for this object depends on the cosmological parameters, but for an OmegaM=0.3 vacuum-dominated flat model the velocity is 585,611 km/sec. This is faster than light.

Shamlessly plagarized :moon:

information overload :laugh:
 
Light reflectivity and spectrum analysis proves that many factors of light absorbing colors contribute to a quantum factor that is attributed to the speed of light and relative ......
I'm sorry, ... What was the question?

Bubba
 
White is the fastest color photon theorem (nevada beach front) . Everyone knows that white reflects photos. The unique hayabusa body work reflects these photons in a rearward direction resulting in extra thrust. I am sorry but you black Hayabusa owner suffer from photon absorption and distortion of body work resulting in increased aerodynamic resistance. :rofl::rofl:

So black absorption from the front would result in anti-thrust which would cause the bike to be pulled into warp speed? :laugh:
 
I'm sorry, you were close, but you got it wrong....

Color pertains to wavelength and wavelength pertains to energy.
In the visible light spectrum violet is at the high end of the spectrum with the lowest wavelength (around 400 nm), which means it has the most energy.
Red light (700 nm) has the least energy.

The visible spectrum from lowest to highest energy is ROYGBIV, or red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, violet.

Thereby proving, red's are slowest, oranges are down there with reds, blue's are faster! and that purple bike, well, we'll ignore it. In case you're wondering, white is slowest of all because it is a culmination of all colors and is just confused.
 
I'm sorry, you were close, but you got it wrong....

Color pertains to wavelength and wavelength pertains to energy.
In the visible light spectrum violet is at the high end of the spectrum with the lowest wavelength (around 400 nm), which means it has the most energy.
Red light (700 nm) has the least energy.

The visible spectrum from lowest to highest energy is ROYGBIV, or red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, violet.

Thereby proving, red's are slowest, oranges are down there with reds, blue's are faster! and that purple bike, well, we'll ignore it. In case you're wondering, white is slowest of all because it is a culmination of all colors and is just confused.

Then BLUE IS THE FASTEST! All right! :moon::cheerleader::banana::boxing:
 
Velocity is related more to the density of the medium through which an object is traveling than to its wave length, also higher energy (shorter wavelength) tend to suffer more from scattering due to their shorter nature.

The Doppler Effect as it pertains to the red/blue shift above is accurate for determining the relative direction of travel.

All light travels at the same speed in a given medium.

White reflects all colors equally; black absorbs them, the other colors fall in between.

Relatively speaking then, a white bike should travel faster with the sun behind gaining the benefit of its reflective properties, and a black bike faster into the sun by taking advantage of absorption, thus white bikes should travel west in the morning and east in the evening for maximum advantage, and should be careful not to bottom out when the sun is directly overhead.

Grey, then, strikes a nice balance, moving equally fast into or out of the sun.
 
White reflects all colors equally; black absorbs them, the other colors fall in between.

Relatively speaking then, a white bike should travel faster with the sun behind gaining the benefit of its reflective properties, and a black bike faster into the sun by taking advantage of absorption, thus white bikes should travel west in the morning and east in the evening for maximum advantage, and should be careful not to bottom out when the sun is directly overhead.

Grey, then, strikes a nice balance, moving equally fast into or out of the sun.

:rofl: That's pretty good~!~
 
Last edited:
Back
Top