Best to change front sprocket or rear?

Shibumi

Donating Member
Joined
May 16, 2006
Messages
2,708
Reaction score
1
(BA BUSA @ Sep. 16 2007,10:39)
(Shibumi @ Sep. 16 2007,08
zzwhip.gif
)
(Charlesbusa @ Sep. 16 2007,10:25)
(USN05LE @ Sep. 16 2007,07:26)
(BusaWhipped @ Sep. 15 2007,20:48) If you are going with a 190/55 rear tire, the shortened WB may cause some clearance problems. Otherwise, you are GTG
smile.gif
Couldn't you just put a chain on it with 113 links and solve the clearance issue when running a 55 series tire?

Don
Yup.
That's what I will do.
smile.gif


Just got my 190/55 Quali...
super.gif
+1 go with a 43 rear, 190/55, and just add a link or two
wink.gif


****You don't have to add a link for the 43...ONLY if you go bigger on the rear...44 and up with a 17 front****
Why a 43 instead of 42? Someone my size, won't it tend to wheelie?
rock.gif


smile.gif

BA BUSA

MotoGP Wannabe
Donating Member
Joined
May 15, 2003
Messages
35,326
Reaction score
70
(Shibumi @ Sep. 16 2007,18:31)
(BA BUSA @ Sep. 16 2007,10:39)
(Shibumi @ Sep. 16 2007,08
zzwhip.gif
)
(Charlesbusa @ Sep. 16 2007,10:25)
(USN05LE @ Sep. 16 2007,07:26)
(BusaWhipped @ Sep. 15 2007,20:48) If you are going with a 190/55 rear tire, the shortened WB may cause some clearance problems.  Otherwise, you are GTG
smile.gif
Couldn't you just put a chain on it with 113 links and solve the clearance issue when running a 55 series tire?

Don
Yup.
That's what I will do.  
smile.gif


Just got my 190/55 Quali...    
super.gif
+1 go with a 43 rear, 190/55, and just add a link or two  
wink.gif


****You don't have to add a link for the 43...ONLY if you go bigger on the rear...44 and up with a 17 front****
Why a 43 instead of 42? Someone my size, won't it tend to wheelie?  
rock.gif
If you were running a 190/50 I would say go with the 42...with the 190/55 43 is better
muscle.gif


The 55 is taller and has the same effect as going down on the rear sprocket.



Don't know if you have used this chart, but a 190/50 with 17/42 @ 11,000 rpm=195 mph.

The 190/55 with 17/43 @ 11,000 rpm=196mph.

smile.gif

proud dad

Registered
Joined
Dec 7, 2006
Messages
9,694
Reaction score
71
yup....17/42 here.always go up in the rear to save chain life
beerchug.gif

ks-waterbug

Group Buy Guy
Donating Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2002
Messages
9,131
Reaction score
20
Approx values are....
1 down in front same as roughly 3 up in back!

I would do as suggested... Up in the rear and leave the front alone!

Over_Easy

GEO-STABILIZATION EXPERT
Donating Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2006
Messages
4,524
Reaction score
5
Dealer service Mgr. recommended not going down in front sprocket...only up in the rear sprocket...42 or 43 it's your choice.

frogpirate

Registered
Joined
Sep 12, 2007
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
(Over_Easy @ Sep. 17 2007,11:27)
Does gearing down to 17/43 affect gas freeway gas mileage much? I ass-ume this is done to make the higher gears a little more useful and give a little more punch in the lower gears, since most of is don't really need to go 185 on a daily basis.

BA BUSA

MotoGP Wannabe
Donating Member
Joined
May 15, 2003
Messages
35,326
Reaction score
70
Yes your mileage will go down a bit with the 17/43 gear change...but the fun level goes up
super.gif

The Big Red One

Registered
Joined
Jul 18, 2004
Messages
2,569
Reaction score
96
(BA BUSA @ Sep. 17 2007,16:53) Yes your mileage will go down a bit with the 17/43 gear change...but the fun level goes up  
super.gif
I think the mileage goes down BECAUSE the fun factor goes up
tounge.gif
I don't notice much diff in my mileage when I'm cruising...but with the lower gears I don't "cruise" near as much as I used to
laugh.gif
Back
Top