Another question.....Choke on FI?

OB_boneman

Registered
Joined
Dec 8, 1999
Messages
110
Reaction score
0
Here's another question I've been pondering
for some time and one many couldn't answer with a reasonable amount of sense....

Why on earth does the busa have a choke
if it's fuel injected? The triumphs I've
seen don't have one and cars certainly don't have them....is this a poor mans version
of FI? What's the scoop?

OB_Dr Busa

Registered
Joined
Sep 8, 1999
Messages
244
Reaction score
0
It's not a choke, it's an idle adjuster. I'm surprised that they didn't make it adapt itself.

But on the other hand it works well as a cruisecontrol. When the engine is hot i can do 90 km/h not touching the throttle !!! You can do this since the "choke" doesn't change the fuel mixture.

http://home.swipnet.se/fredrik_sagvold

OB_Bob

Registered
Joined
Jun 20, 1999
Messages
654
Reaction score
3
Its not a choke. Just a sort of fast idle. It opens the throttle blades.
But, it sort of has a choke in that the idle is richer with a cold motor than hot. The ECM compensates for engine temp, among other things.
Bob

OB_boneman

Registered
Joined
Dec 8, 1999
Messages
110
Reaction score
0
"Idle adjuster", interesting....with a little
more work that could have been automated.

So does the cable actually link up somehow
to the adjuster knob that resides on the lower right portion of the bike? Or does
that adjust something separately from the throttle bodies?

Anyway, thanks for the tip....I'll have
to give the cruise control idea a go. :)

Gixx1300R

Registered
Joined
Jul 15, 1999
Messages
2,706
Reaction score
253
I would rather keep the fast idle manual.I can just imagine an Automatic idle getting stuck.It happens with cars all of the time.

OB_EXCLR8

Registered
Joined
Jul 8, 1999
Messages
136
Reaction score
0
If they automated the choke they would have to install some type of stepping motor and controler. That would have added weight and cost. If they used an idle air then it would have to have one for every cylinder, again more weight. They could have used an O2 sensor and just richend up the mixture a bit, but then you could not use leaded fuel witht the stock FI. I am sure there is some other way to do it automated, but most would add weight and cost. I am glad they did not.

EXCLR8

[This message has been edited by EXCLR8 (edited 03 February 2000).]

OB_Animal

Registered
Joined
Sep 20, 1999
Messages
563
Reaction score
0
Right, could have been automated, but that indeed adds parts/weight/cost and means that you don't CONTROL it to your liking anymore!

Honda uses an automated version on their EFI but this can mean that it's still "adjusting" when you would have thought it no longer needing it and also still influencing mpg in a bad way.

It really is just a fast-idle and I've completely removed the entire thing on mine as I don't let the bike idle at all before jumping on it fully geared-up. I start it up when I'm all ready, do a very short bit of fast idle with my own right-hand (well developed that one I might add ...) and then ride off to slowly warm it up without heavily loading it.

If you wanna see how it works you only have to look on the RH side under the tank where
the throttle cables lead to.


[This message has been edited by Animal (edited 04 February 2000).]
Back
Top