Missing 777 theories?

The Pilots did it they are at the bottom of the ocean close to Antarctica. But why did they do it. As soon as they said the Capitan had a simulator it was a no brainer.
 
The copilot having a simulator means jack squat. He really liked to fly, and that was his job.

He's also not the one they're focusing on right now.
 
They're talking about the pilot (below). This is the guy described as being upset over a political situation before getting into the jet.


Shah, a father-of-three, described as 'loving and generous' in an online tribute video was said to be a 'fanatical' supporter of the country's opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim - jailed for homosexuality just hours before the jet disappeared.

It has also been revealed that the pilot's wife and three children moved out of the family home the day before the plane went missing.

Some senior US officials believe it is possible the plane was taken as part of a ‘dry run’ for a future terrorist attack – in order to find out whether a plane can be hidden from radar and satellites.
Click to expand...
 
Some senior US officials believe it is possible the plane was taken as part of a ‘dry run’ for a future terrorist attack – in order to find out whether a plane can be hidden from radar and satellites.



Um, it worked.... :banghead:
 
Most likely this is an exceptionally creative launch campaign for "Lost Returns" and will be the largest national joke in existence ever to launch a TV show...

In case I'm wrong, I do feel horrible for all the families involved that for some reason we have not yet seen on the news or media posting about where their family members are or being interviewed by every major news network and being aired 24 hours a day on national television...
 
A few days ago, a former pilot named Chris Goodfellow articulated an entirely different theory on Google+.

This theory fits the facts.

And it's one of the most plausible yet:


Shortly after takeoff, as Malaysia 370 was flying out over the ocean, just after the co-pilot gave his final "Good night" sign-off to Malaysia air traffic control, smoke began filling the cockpit, perhaps from a tire on the front landing gear that had ignited on takeoff
The captain immediately did exactly what he had been trained to do: Turn the plane toward the closest airport so he could land.
The closest appropriate airport was called Pulau Langkawi. It had a massive 13,000-foot runway. The captain programmed the destination into the flight computer. The auto-pilot turned the plane west and put it on a course right for the runway (the same heading the plane turned to)
The captain and co-pilot tried to find the source of the smoke and fire. They switched off electrical "busses" to try to isolate it, in the process turning off systems like the transponder and ACARs automated update system (but not, presumably, the auto-pilot, which was flying the plane). They did not issue a distress call, because in a mid-air emergency your priorities are "aviate, navigate, communicate" — in that order. But smoke soon filled the cockpit and overwhelmed them (a tire fire could do this). The pilots passed out or died.
Smoke filled the cabin and overwhelmed and distracted the passengers and cabin crew... or the cockpit door was locked and/or the cockpit was filled with smoke, so no one could enter the cockpit to try to figure out where the plane was, how the pilots were, or how the plane might be successfully landed. (This would be a complicated task, even if one knew the pilots were unconscious and had access to the cockpit, especially if most of the plane's electrical systems were switched off or damaged)
With no one awake to instruct the auto-pilot to land, the plane kept flying on its last programmed course... right over Pulau Langkawi and out over the Indian Ocean. The engine-update system kept "pinging" the satellite. Eventually, 6 or 7 hours after the incident, the plane ran out of fuel and crashed.

snip

The left turn is the key here. This was a very experienced senior Captain with 18,000 hours. Maybe some of the younger pilots interviewed on CNN didn't pick up on this left turn. We old pilots were always drilled to always know the closest airport of safe harbor while in cruise. Airports behind us, airports abeam us and airports ahead of us. Always in our head. Always. Because if something happens you don't want to be thinking what are you going to do - you already know what you are going to do. Instinctively when I saw that left turn with a direct heading I knew he was heading for an airport. Actually he was taking a direct route to Palau Langkawi a 13,000 foot strip with an approach over water at night with no obstacles. He did not turn back to Kuala Lampur because he knew he had 8,000 foot ridges to cross. He knew the terrain was friendlier towards Langkawi and also a shorter distance.
Click to expand...
 
mysql said:
A few days ago, a former pilot named Chris Goodfellow articulated an entirely different theory on Google+.

This theory fits the facts.

And it's one of the most plausible yet:
Click to expand...

This all seems more palatable than most anything else out there...

via Samsung Galaxy SIII
 
What's the reasoning for the altitude climbing and descending then?
 
Several of the unattended plane crashes (flown by autopilot) hit heights above the service ceiling.


The general consensus is, if you want to incapacitate the passengers, you release the air pressure slowly; they won't notice what happened. The climb and dive, (if it was done intentionally) would be to evade radar, but that wouldn't explain why they climbed so high before diving.
 
mysql said:
A few days ago, a former pilot named Chris Goodfellow articulated an entirely different theory on Google+.

This theory fits the facts.

And it's one of the most plausible yet:
Click to expand...

Except that if they were in the process of losing all these systems, why no radio contact besides "Alright Goodnight" within moments of these things being shutdown. Also if I am not mistaken, ACARS would report automatically any loss of pressure, electrical buss failures etc. if it were happening. This "theory" above would be more plausible if the pilots had sent a distress call or had not said "Alright Goodnight" as the cockpit is filling with smoke around them.
 
TallTom said:
Except that if they were in the process of losing all these systems, why no radio contact besides "Alright Goodnight" within moments of these things being shutdown. Also if I am not mistaken, ACARS would report automatically any loss of pressure, electrical buss failures etc. if it were happening. This "theory" above would be more plausible if the pilots had sent a distress call or had not said "Alright Goodnight" as the cockpit is filling with smoke around them.
Click to expand...

Have you listened to most of the black box recordings listed on this site?

Last words

A good number of the crashes listed happened to planes that were 100% functional in terms of flight capabilities. Usually it was operator error not figuring out why the sensors were not functional.

In stress situations, people don't always act rationally.
 
Search for missing Malaysia Airlines plane now encompasses area larger than Australia | News.com.au

THE search for the missing Malaysia Airlines passenger jet has grown to encompass an area slightly larger than the entire land mass of Australia, as Thailand’s military says its radar detected a plane that may have been flight MH370 just minutes after the jetliner’s communications went down.

But Thailand didn’t share the information with Malaysia earlier because it wasn’t specifically asked for it.

A twisting flight path described yesterday by Thai air force spokesman Air Vice Marshal Montol Suchookorn took the plane to the Strait of Malacca, which is where Malaysian radar tracked Flight 370 early March 8. But Vice Marshal Montol said the Thai military doesn’t know whether it detected the same plane.

Thailand’s failure to quickly share possible information regarding the fate of the plane, and the 239 people aboard it, may not substantially change what Malaysian officials know, but it raises questions about the degree to which some countries are sharing their defence information, even in the name of an urgent and mind-bending aviation mystery.

When asked why it took so long to release the information, Vice Marshal Montol said, “Because we did not pay any attention to it. The Royal Thai Air Force only looks after any threats against our country, so anything that did not look like a threat to us, we simply look at it without taking actions.”
Click to expand...
 
mysql said:
Have you listened to most of the black box recordings listed on this site?

Last words

A good number of the crashes listed happened to planes that were 100% functional in terms of flight capabilities. Usually it was operator error not figuring out why the sensors were not functional.

In stress situations, people don't always act rationally.
Click to expand...

While I don't disagree with your thoughts, Air France went down and its ACARS was sending fault alarms some 40something times as the crew flew.

Nothing on 370 indicates that the ACARS was sending any faults.
 
My theory

IMG_12788915740812.jpeg

IMG_12788915740812.jpeg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

skydivr
The Ulitimate Differental Theory of US Armed Forces (Snake Model)
Replies
6
Views
877
dadofthree
dadofthree
Fate
The killing of the EV1, government conspiracy?
Replies
3
Views
2,301
jefferycarman
jefferycarman
MC MUSTANG
Bash and Hayabusa Bash
2 3 4
Replies
69
Views
6,696
Loomis
Loomis
Cookie
Hey! What did I miss?
2
Replies
27
Views
1,669
Lycan
Lycan
1127 TO 1299
Area husband pretends to give a shid
Replies
12
Views
783
justintime2
justintime2
Back
Top