It doesn't surprise me one bit that Doge is uncovering all these expenditures that have been occurring for decades under many different administrations....
What I don't believe are some of the line items......they know what Doge is doing is very, very unpopular so in order to justify what it is doing, they have to throw a few eye-brow raising line items in there......the Doge team consists of a bunch of kids who are very adept in computer skills so making up a spreadsheet which has these sorts of crazy items in it is child's play for them......
I'm 100% skeptical of their findings...
But I do believe what they are doing is a good thing.......checking the books is always a good idea......who is checking them is what I question.
Doge should have consisted of an elected (or regulated), security checked bipartisan team with an independent broker as the chair person.
I've seen audits being done before and they were well done, completely transparent and above board......unlike this one....
