outofmyway
Registered
This is just my personal view and you may or may not agree with me.
A few days ago I posted some pictures in the random pictures thread. They have been promptly taken down within 2 days of posting. The pictures are of my work with professional models. My company is the sponsor for the largest pageant in the world, the Hooters International Swimsuit pageant. These pictures are used on my website and printed marketing material (tv/magazine commercials). The pictures are that of girls shot in competition bikinis, they have also been posted to numerous other car/bike forums I belong to without problems.
None of the shots I took contain any nudity or lscivious behavior, so I find it interesting that while it is permissible by the mods to allow pictures displaying animals engaging in sexual acts and laugh about it but removing tasteful shots that are acceptable to be distributed to the general public.
So if I posted a picture of a painting of DaVinci that contained "nudity" that is displayed in art museums around the world would it be removed, because you would label it "inappropiate"? Would you lable the SI swimsuit issue an "adult" magazine? Do you blind fold your child's eyes on the beach?
Am I the only person that feels the big brother behavior of this particular forum is overkill?
A few days ago I posted some pictures in the random pictures thread. They have been promptly taken down within 2 days of posting. The pictures are of my work with professional models. My company is the sponsor for the largest pageant in the world, the Hooters International Swimsuit pageant. These pictures are used on my website and printed marketing material (tv/magazine commercials). The pictures are that of girls shot in competition bikinis, they have also been posted to numerous other car/bike forums I belong to without problems.
None of the shots I took contain any nudity or lscivious behavior, so I find it interesting that while it is permissible by the mods to allow pictures displaying animals engaging in sexual acts and laugh about it but removing tasteful shots that are acceptable to be distributed to the general public.
So if I posted a picture of a painting of DaVinci that contained "nudity" that is displayed in art museums around the world would it be removed, because you would label it "inappropiate"? Would you lable the SI swimsuit issue an "adult" magazine? Do you blind fold your child's eyes on the beach?
Am I the only person that feels the big brother behavior of this particular forum is overkill?