Now that' a LIE!!Junk.. Chrome's for Caddy's not Busa's
I guess if you say so. I just can't understand why someone would alter somthing that was designed for ultimate performance to something that some feel would be astheticly pleasing to the eye at the cost of a great loss of performance.Now that' a LIE!!Junk.. Chrome's for Caddy's not Busa's
If you guys want a bike that can handle the corners better then anything you shouldn't be lookin at the busa.You should be more interested in the gsxr750 or the gsxr1000.Lets face it lowering this bike and stretching and adding nos,air shifter and a couple of mods to it,didn't take any time off the top speed.Sounds and looks like to me a couple of you bashers have some beef stuck between your teeth.I guess if you say so. I just can't understand why someone would alter somthing that was designed for ultimate performance to something that some feel would be astheticly pleasing to the eye at the cost of a great loss of performance.Now that' a LIE!!Junk.. Chrome's for Caddy's not Busa's
I believe in "form follow function". If it don't make you go faster turn better or stop sooner it don't belong. And if it happens to look good and increase perfomance thats just a bonus.
That's why I think chrome's for caddy's and harley's. They look pretty but = 0 on the perfomance. Just my .02
If you want a blingmobile, fine. I can appreciate what you've done to your bike and why you done it. Don't go actin' like the busa doesn't handle though. As someone else mentioned it's mostly about the rider. The busa will handle better than a HUGE percentage of the sport riders on the road can ride. Personally there's a limit to how "fast" I'm willing to hit twisties on the street. The busa handles fine up to my self imposed limit and seems to have more to spare. My experience is that if I have the balls to push it, it pulls through and asks for more.If you guys want a bike that can handle the corners better then anything you shouldn't be lookin at the busa.You should be more interested in the gsxr750 or the gsxr1000.Lets face it lowering this bike and stretching and adding nos,air shifter and a couple of mods to it,didn't take any time off the top speed.Sounds and looks like to me a couple of you bashers have some beef stuck between your teeth.![]()
Well being that this is your first post on this forum and it is regarding your bike I will attempt to better explain myself.If you guys want a bike that can handle the corners better then anything you shouldn't be lookin at the busa.You should be more interested in the gsxr750 or the gsxr1000.Lets face it lowering this bike and stretching and adding nos,air shifter and a couple of mods to it,didn't take any time off the top speed.Sounds and looks like to me a couple of you bashers have some beef stuck between your teeth.I guess if you say so. I just can't understand why someone would alter somthing that was designed for ultimate performance to something that some feel would be astheticly pleasing to the eye at the cost of a great loss of performance.Now that' a LIE!!Junk.. Chrome's for Caddy's not Busa's
I believe in "form follow function". If it don't make you go faster turn better or stop sooner it don't belong. And if it happens to look good and increase perfomance thats just a bonus.
That's why I think chrome's for caddy's and harley's. They look pretty but = 0 on the perfomance. Just my .02![]()