Ok so finally got some time off work to go ahead and tackle this.
I bought the bike used in 2015, started and ran well, performed as good as any stock gen 1, but doing a compression test for the fun revealed a 160ish psi across all 4 condition.
Spec was 171 - 228psi, service limit 128psi.
I left well enough alone as the bike worked fine.
But cut forward 5 years and it was gradually becoming harder and harder to start.
By 2021 it wouldn't start at all, unless you hooked up a really strong battery and spun the bejesus out of it, then it would just about start.
Anyway did another compression test and found all four were down around 142 - 152 psi cranking.
This rose a shade with a drop of oil in cylinder.
Figured it was time to rip the head off.
Cut to 2023 when I got the time;
Indeed you can remove the cylinder head and the cylinder block from the crankcase without removing the engine from the chassis, but I will wager that it is probably easier overall to just remove the engine in the first place.
Found that no special tools are required (unless you're measuring bore diameters) except a couple of castle nut sockets.
Lucky I had the 30mm but I had to make the other from a 14mm socket.
Anyway I found the valves to be in very clean & in good nick (apart from left hand intake valve on cylinder #1 which was coked up for some reason but still closed perfectly from what I could see - cleaned and lapped it anyway).
The head gasket was good.
So this left only the piston rings or something in that regard to be worn in order to explain the low compression.
I pulled the block and checked rings.
I found the ring gaps to be significantly larger than spec.
Top ring
Specification: 0.08 - 0.20mm (service limit 0.50mm)
As Found: 0.36 - 0.41mm
2nd ring
Specification: 0.15 - 0.30mm (service limit 0.50mm)
As Found: 0.36 - 0.53mm
So I thought, woohoo, that explains the low compression etc.
But then when I popped the new, straight from Japan, Suzuki rings in, the gaps came back not much better!!
Top ring 0.31 - 0.36mm
2nd ring 0.28 - 0.33mm
What the eff.
So I measured up the bores, even though they looked good with no scratches or wearing signs.
Found the bores with this gauge, and also a telescopic bore gauge, to be about 81.06mm.
Specification 81.000 to 81.015mm.
Checked too at very top directly with a calipers, to be the same. And this is above where the top ring actually touches.
The bores had literally zero variability off the 81.06mm, up down left right, no change. Dead straight, but a bit above spec.
It is like the large ring gaps are caused by the cylinder bores being too large, and they were that way from factory as I can't see how the cylinders could be worn given they are dead even top to bottom, even where the piston doesn't go.
But it doesn't make sense that they would be too large from factory.
Anyway, I put it all back together and after a bit of work priming the fuel line, it started and ran good.
Stopped and restarted it a few times, all good.
Not broken in yet and no compression test done since rebuild.