My point is that the boy gave them a very detailed description of MJ's penis, even noting where his color splotches were when he was erect. How could he have known that? Psychic?
Since you don't like the Smoking Gun or Fox News....
JACKO PRIVATES PIC BLOCKED
CNN.com - Witnesses detail estrangement between Michael Jackson and his accuser - Mar 31, 2005 "Katz is the psychologist who interviewed the 1993 accuser. The boy reportedly was able to identify Jackson by the distinctive splotches on his buttocks and penis."
If that's not enough, here you go: michael jackson penis splotch - Google News Archive Search
So now you've seen MJ's co*k have you. It was never disclosed before or during the trial that the statements made regarding the description of his genitals were even accurate. Medical records were known to have been leaked and not hard for them to have gotten a hold of.
It was however found that the child had been coached in detail by his MOM. Who was credited by multiple close friends & family members to have been involved in theft and was a habitual liar. The family was deep in debt and had previously solicited MJ for money.
When a family such as theirs needs money. Do you really find it so hard to believe that people can't make things up in order to get what they want.
The case was thrown out. The family should have been charged IMO.
But hey....I'm going to remember the great things about him. And not crap on someone the day after they die.
so now we play the game of "discredit the source?" LOL classic. Bet you vote for Ralph Nader a lot too dont you?
Source please? since you seem to need one, so do we. and we'll be the judge of how biased it is.
No, we need sources to back what it is he said about the mom lying, etc. After all, we want to make sure that nobody is just making it up, and its a reputable source.
But thanks for making all these assumptions bout me, when you dont even know me.
btw, he wasnt acquitted, the case was dropped. BIG difference. Not that I would expect you to understand. Probably werent enough pictures drawn with crayon for you.
My source is the facts! He was acquitted in case you forgot.
But guilty before proven innocent is a motto I'm sure you live by.