(reaper0995 @ Oct. 18 2006,12:46)
(selberg @ Oct. 17 2006,22:14) a/w allows for you to have below ambient temps though.
physics wont allow it. the energy has to be displaced somehow, and water, without physically changing states, cannot do this.
see, an a/c in a car can make lower than ambient temps by taking a gas at ambient temp, then compressing it considerably. with it compressed, it condenses its energy content into a smaller volume, thus it has a greatly increased temperature. then, with its new high temp, 'cool' ambient air passes over it to bring the compressed gas closer to ambient temps. then, it is decompressed, but has lost energy that it had prior to compression, thus it is sub-ambient.
water does not change state, ie is not compressed, so it cannot acheive sub ambient temps. the only way water could achieve sub-ambient temps would be to have it evaporate over the cooler, thus drawing out its energy (heat). much like how sweat cools you down in the summer. but since the water is not being compressed NOR evaporating, it is theoritically impossible for this to happen. BUT, you can put ice in the resevior, and THAT will bring it lower than ambient, but not CONTINUOUSLY. that is, once the ice melts, then it will no longer be sub-ambient.
not saying that w/a is bad, but in the case of a continuously running system, it has a lower limit of potential than a/a. i will most likely be running one of these sooner or later on my bike, seeing that an a/a intercooler is $$$$, and w/a can be cheap (if you know how to weld aluminum....though i dont YET) because you can use a radiator for another bike or a remotely located one like the nlr systems once did.