DSL or CABLE

TakRail

Registered
Well, I've had some form of cable internet for years. Although It was mainly because I was big into online games. Now I pretty much just use the internet to check email, surfing, occasionally download stuff and can't for get PORN, lol.

Right now I'm with Charter and I have my own wireless router so I can surf anywhere in my home. Oh ya. There is 3 laptops and a desktop running through the router.

Anyways, I like the speed of cable but I'm wondering if I went with DSL (Its cheaper) would the speed be that much of a difference for what I do on the internet?
 
Stay with the cable modem.
super.gif
 
I have Hughes Net satilite dish.Had no other choice where I live other than dial up.A 3ft diameter dish on the roof just for internet.I wish I could get cable or DSL,it's quicker.
 
I went from CableVision cable to Verizon DSL. A step backward that I never regreted.
 
That is like asking what is faster....A 1300cc Busa or a 1300cc Harley dresser.
 
DSL sucks, trust me I have it... I had Cox cable before, and it was awesome. But DSL is the only thing offered in my area and its no where near as quick as cable. We even have the upgraded "PRO" version. LOL
 
Went from cable to DSL and it sucked.. back on cable now at home and broadband in the truck,,
 
Stay w/ cable.

I've had them all (dial-up, satellite, DSL, Cable).

Cable has been the fastest / best bang for the buck.

10 Mbps Cable is the same price as 6 Mbps DSL in my area.

(I just wish Verizon were out here...would love to get FIOS!)
 
I moved out of the city to a small rural setting about August last yr..
Only thing out here is DSl- it sucks bigtime...
Stay with your cable, I miss mine...
 
Cable is faster depending on where you live. all internet that travels through the cable has to share bandwidth with other internet cable subscribers so if you live in an innercity area this would not be a good option, becuase your bandwidth would be broken down in between too many residents. dsl in this case would be the better option, becuase it uses it own line so there is no effect on how many people subscribe. if you live in the subburbs cable would benifit you more.

Hope this helps
beerchug.gif
 
(proud dad @ Jun. 02 2007,21:17) I have Hughes Net satilite dish.Had no other choice where I live other than dial up.A 3ft diameter dish on the roof just for internet.I wish I could get cable or DSL,it's quicker.
Mee too
mad.gif
Comcast just won't come to the wilderness
mad.gif
at&t says no DSL here in my life time.
AAAssjani.gif


I gues I'm stuck with satellite. If I had a preference it would be cable...but if cost is an issue DSL is not bad.

mad.gif
 
I just recently had a face to face with a AT&T tech.

at least for my area, for AT&T they are now starting to offer I think up to T1 speed on DSL in some areas.

How they are able to do this is fiber.

In some areas where customers are not within the normal DSL range from the main facility, they are running a fiber line to the neighbor hood and then running copper from their to the houses.

New housing around here is being equipped with phone fiber right to the house

Any new house in our area that has fiber to it can get DSL speeds that way exceed ANYTHING cable will ever be able to offer.


So I would check your area, talk with technicians and find out what your area has to offer as far as fiber goes and what future growth towards fiber is expected.

If fiber isn't an option then it will depend on how far you are from the main facility. The closer you are, the fast speeds they can offer, the father, the less they can offer on copper.

If you can get 3mb or more download on DSL, then the only way you are really going to notice it is when downloading files. Just web browsing by itself there will probably not be much of noticeable difference.

If you however spend most of your day downloading and uploading files, then yes every lit bit of speed you can get counts.

Another thing to consider is when you are on Cable you are basically on the same connection as everyone else in your neighborhood. If you have any hackers in your neighbor hood it provides them a challenge and provides you with a hug security risk.

While you can take steps to mitigate your risk such as firewalls (hard and soft) it is still a risk that is not inherent in DSL.


Bottom line, check and see what your max DSL speed is for you area, ask specifically about fiber optics to your home then based on that determine what your needs are and determine the risks you are willing to accept and risks you are not willing to accept

i.e if you are just a home user browsing the internet not too much risk in getting hack over cable, however if you are running a business, do stock trading on line, do a lot of banking online your potential for adverse affects from being hacked over cable have increased and need to include calculation when performing a risk assessment on your home network.

Then make you full determination after performing a proper analysis comparing risk assessment, mitigation steps available and network performance needs

Good luck
beerchug.gif
 
You can have both for a while. 30 days money back or something like that.
Try them both and compare.
 
Not trying to sound like a dipshit. But I know very little about DSL setup. Can I still use my router with DSL so I can still have all the computers in my house connected like I do now with cable?

Ya, I'd say that 99% of my internet use is just web browsing (Mostly Forums) or email. Once in a while I'll download something but not often.
 
(RODIMUS @ Jun. 03 2007,13:10) Not trying to sound like a dipshit. But I know very little about DSL setup. Can I still use my router with DSL so I can still have all the computers in my house connected like I do now with cable?

Ya, I'd say that 99% of my internet use is just web browsing (Mostly Forums) or email. Once in a while I'll download something but not often.
Not a dumb question at all... yes you can use your router but you'll have to go into the setup and change it to PPPOE (for DSL) and enter your DSL ID and password. Not a big deal at all.
 
(thrasherfox @ Jun. 03 2007,07:44) If you can get 3mb or more download on DSL, then the only way you are really going to notice it is when downloading files. Just web browsing by itself there will probably not be much of noticeable difference.
Ya, basically cable is costing me $56 a month. I'm just wondering if the cost is justified for what I get and what I use. With cable I'm getting the 3 Mbps/512 Kbps. It looks like with going with DSL I can get the same for almost half the price or faster for about the same price.

AT&T Yahoo offers
Down-stream Up-stream Monthly Price
Up to 768 Kbps Up to 128 Kbps $14.99

Up to 1.5 Mbps Up to 384 Kbps $19.99

Up to 3.0 Mbps Up to 512 Kbps $24.99

Up to 6.0 Mbps Up to 768 Kbps $34.99


Don't know if this helps but here is the rounter I'm running...
http://kbserver.netgear.com/products/WPNT834.asp
 
What Solarbarak and Thrasherfox sed.

On the other hand, if you can get 6 Mbps for $35/month, that's probably a good deal, really. Generally speaking, cable is faster than DSL but slightly less secure and your neighbors can't all be using it all the time when you're using it! Crazy, I know.

Also, if they are promising you 6 Mbps you will NOT get that speed if you are too far from the CO (Central Office) where the phone company's DSL equipment resides. I think you have to be within 2 or three thousand feet or so from the CO in order to be able to get reliable 6 Mbps. Otherwise, it will always step down to compensate (2 or 3 Mbps) and you'll always be paying for something you're not getting.

Good that you're checking into it, though. Good luck! Any other questions, tell us!

--Wag--
 
Back
Top