mark_ckr
Registered
I am having a hard time deciding between
D&D 4:2 full system or D&D slip-ons.
I have decided to go with carbon cans either way.
Here in order are the features I most care about to
least care about.
#1. Sound (want lots of it)
#2. Look (want dual carbon cans)
#3. Weight savings
#4. Performance increase
From my research D&D's are one of the most aggressive sounding pipes out there, which is what I want.
As far as the look the only reason I like the slip-on just
a bit better than the full 4:2 is the size of the factory
mid-pipe. I like the larger size factory mid-pipe compared
to the mid-pipe on the full 4:2.
But that can be over looked if the last two features make up for it. If weight savings and performance gains are
significant enough going with the full 4:2 vs. slip-ons, I can over look the mid-pipe deficiency.
What do you think?
Oppinions please?
The full 4:2 cost $200 more than the slip-ons.
Also, if there is any chance that the full 4:2 could melt my fairings that would also make a difference.
D&D 4:2 full system or D&D slip-ons.
I have decided to go with carbon cans either way.
Here in order are the features I most care about to
least care about.
#1. Sound (want lots of it)
#2. Look (want dual carbon cans)
#3. Weight savings
#4. Performance increase
From my research D&D's are one of the most aggressive sounding pipes out there, which is what I want.
As far as the look the only reason I like the slip-on just
a bit better than the full 4:2 is the size of the factory
mid-pipe. I like the larger size factory mid-pipe compared
to the mid-pipe on the full 4:2.
But that can be over looked if the last two features make up for it. If weight savings and performance gains are
significant enough going with the full 4:2 vs. slip-ons, I can over look the mid-pipe deficiency.
What do you think?
Oppinions please?
The full 4:2 cost $200 more than the slip-ons.
Also, if there is any chance that the full 4:2 could melt my fairings that would also make a difference.