and the govt' grabs some more

Justyntym

The Pessimistic Optimist
Donating Member
Registered
Dodd unveils sweeping financial regulation plan

JIM KUHNHENN
From Associated Press
March 15, 2010 10:52 PM EDT
WASHINGTON (AP) — A new Democratic Senate bill to tame the financial markets would give the government new powers to break up firms that threaten the economy, force the industry to pay for its failures and create an independent consumer watchdog within the Federal Reserve.

Legislation unveiled Monday by Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd falls shy of the ambitious restructuring of federal financial regulations envisioned by President Barack Obama or contained in legislation already passed in the House.

But the 1,336-page bill, which includes provisions negotiated with Republicans, would still be the biggest overhaul of regulations since the New Deal. It comes 18 months after Wall Street's failures helped plunge the nation into a deep recession.

In its sweep, the bill would touch all corners of the financial sector, from small-town mortgage brokers to the highest penthouse office suites on Wall Street. Lobbyists were already mobilizing to change several of its features.

In announcing his bill at a news conference, Dodd stood alone, a sign of the difficult task ahead of him in forging a bill that can pass the Senate. None of the 10 Republicans on his committee endorsed his plan. Several Democrats have voiced dismay at Dodd's decision to reject a plan for a freestanding consumer agency, an Obama regulatory centerpiece.

The bill would create a powerful nine-member Financial Stability Oversight Council, chaired by the treasury secretary, to look out for the systemwide health of the financial sector and to stop financial firms from becoming "too big to fail." The council could place large, interconnected financial institutions under the supervision of the Federal Reserve. And it would have the authority to approve the breakup of large complex companies if they pose a threat to the nation's financial system.

Like the House bill, Dodd's proposal would create a mechanism to shut down large, failing firms, with shareholders and unsecured creditors bearing the losses. Management also would be removed. The costs of such a shutdown would be covered by a $50 billion fund financed by the largest financial firms.

The Federal Reserve, under Dodd's plan, emerges as a leaner institution with new powers to regulate the size and the activities of the nation's largest financial firms. The Fed, once threatened with the loss of all its regulatory powers, will now oversee all bank holding companies with assets of $50 billion or more. But it would also be given power to regulate and even break up large interconnected companies, such as the insurance conglomerate American International Group, whose failure could pose a risk to the economy.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Doing a fair amount of reading and the one OVERWHELMING fact that continues
to permiate is...EVERYTHING the govt' gets involved in, screws the pooch big time.

Point 2, I don't believe it's about saving us...much like healthcare (along with the
education loan package buried in the healthcare bill...what???) it's about CONTROL.

Point 3, related to point 1....what in hell does the fed govt know about business,
they started this whole mess with fanny/freddie and being fiscally irresponsible
massively accelerated by Obama and co.

The govt' does NOTHING well, the more we can get them out of our lives the
better. The free market will take care of itself.

ALL THE WHILE SOCIAL SECURITY IS GOING BANKRUPT, they want to oversight
economics...

Who do you think played a big part in screwing up the car companies...
 
Last edited:
All of your points are good. I think a lot of well informed people will agree.

The government needs to keep it's hands off of the Federal Reserve! It is bound by the Administrative procedure act, and that is enough regulation and oversight for me.
 
Ratings agency warns on US public finances
By Chris Giles and David Oakley in London

Published: March 15 2010 00:00 | Last updated: March 15 2010 00:00

Moody’s Investor Service, the credit rating agency, will fire a warning shot at the US on Monday, saying that unless the country gets public finances into better shape than the Obama administration projects there would be “downward pressure” on its triple A credit rating.

Examining the administration’s outlook for the federal budget deficit, the agency said: “If such a trajectory were to materialise, there would at some point be downward pressure on the triple A rating of the federal government.”

This time the servicing burden would be harder to reverse, however, because it would not be caused by high interest rates but by high debt levels.

Pierre Cailleteau, head of sovereign ratings at Moody’s, said: “The size of debt makes the US vulnerable to an interest rate shock . . . but the level of fiscal ambition is not one that secures for sure the [triple A] rating.”

Moody’s worries that the government will struggle to get political agreement either to raise tax revenues significantly from their current low of 14.8 per cent of national income, or to cut federal spending far from its high of 25.4 per cent of national income.

The report follows concerns recently expressed about the US public finances from the other large rating agencies. Standard & Poor’s warned last week the triple A status of the US was at risk unless the country adopted a credible medium-term plan to rein in fiscal spending. Fitch Ratings issued a critical report on the US in January.

Fitch said: “In the absence of measures to reduce the budget deficit over the next three to five years, government indebtedness will start to approach levels by the latter half of the decade that will bring pressure to bear on the triple A status.”

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

And these are the people that are going to oversight our economy :banghead:

So...do you think they will cut spending or raise taxes...I bet the latter,
NOT TO MENTION...the report does not include the TRILLION dollar health care
debacle should it pass.
 
i got an idea...in an effort to safe our economy...how bout we give an announcement that in a period of time...ohhh lets say 6 months or so...we pull out all our millitary from all the countrys and take a 1 year vacation from the "expenses"... save some bucks and wake people up at the same time
 
If only we could fire them NOW! The Tax Payers (Congress's Employer" doesn't want universal healthcare, or more regulation. The more the government struggles to take control, the more they slit their own throats.

November can't come soon enough!
 
Back
Top