ACLU sues public Library for blocking porn

skydivr

Jumps from perfectly good Airplanes
Donating Member
I just can't fathom this....all in the name of 'freedom' and 'equality'.....
---------------------------------
ACLU sues library for not offering online porn


By msnbc.com staff and news services
The American Civil Liberties Union is suing a Washington state library district for not offering access to online porn, Seattle's King 5 TV reports.
When a user logs on to a computer at the Wenatchee public library, for example, and types "porn" into the search engine, the list of results will appear as if porn doesn't exist, according to King 5.
The search censorship by the North Central Regional Library also means some websites -- such as Google Images and YouTube -- are blocked too. The board decided the filter serves its mission to promote reading and lifelong learning

"We believe having pornography in public places hurts our ability to accomplish our mission," Dan Howard, director of public services, told King 5.
The district won the case in the state Supreme Court two years ago, but the case is now pending in a federal court.
"We are a publicly funded institution," Director Dean Marney said in a statement published on the district website. " It is crazy to think that we should be required to use tax dollars to allow open access to Internet pornography or to become illegal casinos."
The ACLU is representing three library users and a nonprofit organization, and argues that federally funded libraries should disable their filters upon the request of an adult.
“This case is about an overly broad filtering policy that has restricted an adult student from using the Internet for a class assignment and a professional photographer from accessing art galleries online,â€￾ ACLU cooperating attorney Duncan Manville said in a statement.
The North Central Regional Library district, which is the largest in the state and represents 28 libraries in the central part of Washington, admits its policy puts it in the minority among the state's libraries.
For example, despite repeated complaints from women about men watching porn in full view of their children, the Seattle Public Library held fast to its policy of unrestricted online access for adults, according to the Seattle Post Intelligencer.
The paper says the King County Library System has a similar policy: it only filters kids' access on computers. The American Library Association endorses the same stance.
"Sometimes, in a library, you're going to see information that's going to make you uncomfortable," Barbara Jones, director of the association's intellectual freedom office, told radio station KUOW Wednesday.
 
Is the ACLU OK with public libraries being used to upload, download and share child p0rn? Does the ACLU care at all about the costs associated with PCs exposed to viruses when they're fully open to the world wide web? I think the ACLU wants everyone to do everything and it all be OK, but they live under the assumption rights won't be abused. My guess is that if a public library allows full access to patrons and someone is hurt as a result, the ACLU would then go after the public library for allowing that to happen :laugh: You can't have it both ways...

Bottom line for taxpayers - are we responsible for paying to provide such services? Disregarding every other argument the ACLU makes, is the taxpayer OK with funding such activity?
 
If forced, I hope they stand by their principles and turn off all internet access completely rather than allow this. Take your nasty azz down to Seattle public library and let THEM deal with it.
 
Seatle needs to stop also. If you want ot watch porn, do it at your house or the peep show. If I saw it in a library, I would say something to the person watching it.
 
As soon as I saw that King5/Seattle PI was involved, I immediately got suspicious.... they are the 'National Enquirer' of the media up here... :laugh:

So, looking at the title.... gee, sounds awfully headline-grabbing and sensationalistic, doesn't it?

Libraries fight ACLU over online porn

Oh, yes... those godless libtard ACLU heathens want to force porn on our children in public libraries again!

:laugh:

Like all these ACLU outrages, there's almost always two sides to every story. Most reasonable people can conclude that the ACLU isn't just going to go around trying to force porn on kids, that's preposterous; there is certainly more going on here.

I took a glance at the actual ACLU Lawsuit in this case, I ran across the ACTUAL reason the lawsuit was initiated in the first place, and had nothing to do with porn. In the quote below, the "NCRL" is the North Central Regional Libraries; they serve us here in central/eastern Washington:


The lawsuit challenges the NCRL’s policy of refusing to honor requests by adult patrons to temporarily disable a filter on public computers for sessions of reading and research. The NCRL has used a hardware and software product called FortiGuard to block a broad array of lawful content on all public computers at its branch libraries.


So the real story is that back in 2006, there were three adult library patrons trying to do some research, and they couldn't reach certain fully legit web sites, because they were blocked by a filter. They asked for temporary filter removals (the state requires their libraries to offer these filters), but the NCRL refused. They broke state law. Simple. That's what the lawsuit is originally about.

:dunno:

King 5/Seattle PI managed to leverage this lawsuit name into their piece story that, truthfully, is really a story of how the Seattle Public Library mismanages their internet filter issue, and take no steps to prevent abuse. Had the librarian done her job and require the man move to a less visible screen, there would be no story.

:beerchug:
 
those godless libtard ACLU heathens want to force porn on our children in public libraries

Why should I or anybody else care about your facts Warchild, when the truthiness of the above quote taken out of context from your post fits my preconceived views so much better?

cheers
ken
 
Good to know the back story, but as someone who works in IT, I'd like to offer up very legit reasons for having filters that aren't related to p0rn. All types of sites expose computers to viruses and the maintenance and support can be very costly. The filtering isn't so much to control people, but to control what computers are exposed to...


Via DROID X
 
Hmmm? Now I have to go to the library to see if I can get some free porn.
My question is, what about married men who cant watch it at home and want to relax in the privacy of a public library to watch some porn? Where's my rights? Dangit! Er I mean their rights :laugh:
 
Hmmm? Now I have to go to the library to see if I can get some free porn.

Prolly won't work for you there down in evangelical land of south Florida, my brudaah! :laugh:

You must come to the progressive state of Washington to get some of that special public p0rn! :rulez:


:lol:
 
Our library has separate sections labeled 'over 18' '13-18' and 'under 13'
The screens are all in separate areas. Makes me think there are filters on some but not on others.
Maybe?
 
Having a row of unfiltered "over 18" monitors, all facing the back wall (or whatever equivalent) to prevent unintended viewing, would also answer the mail.

Seattle Public Library System is just being idiotic about this. They just need to manage the issue so it's a non-problem. :dunno:
 
Having a row of unfiltered "over 18" monitors, all facing the back wall (or whatever equivalent) to prevent unintended viewing, would also answer the mail.

Seattle Public Library System is just being idiotic about this. They just need to manage the issue so it's a non-problem. :dunno:

I'd argue that it's not the responsibility of taxpayers to pay to provide such a service :whistle:

And I'm not anti-porn, just don't think it should be part of a public service...
 
Back
Top