I doubt that anyone has yet to check them on tear down. If somone has , it has not been made public to my knowledge .
The stock timing events I've seen are ridiculous . A probable typo from Suzuki or other . 97in/109ex .
Also the 2008 cams have not been put on a Cam Doctor that would note duration @.040 lift that i've seen but but believe I have both the new model cams down to +- a couple degree's there at around .040 .
You could check the installed LCA's first and based on the actual centers probably be tempted go 104/107 after removing the head to see if the base gasket could be removed to tighten the quench area but still have ample piston to head clearance and piston to valve on the intake side . Maybe 105/105 . I would have to think abut it after checking stock centerlines of both cams while comparing TQ lines of previous dyno sheets .
One way to know would be take the engine out , bring it a couple hundred miles south with cam sprckets , a new head gasket and guide seals for use after the port clean-up they need . Come back a week later then hit the dyno with it and be most surprised .
Because of the titanium valves on the exhaust side especially , the trend just might be to cam and valve spring the intake with some portwork as the budget build but for longetivity as well . It's got enough compression .....................finally . The Suzuki TLR OEM springs on the intake look like the possible way to go . I really like those springs !
