Recent content by POWERHOUSE

33651-12910

if you have a ten dollar head, wear a ten dollar helmet . . . or no helmet!

That would be what we call a SQUID . . .

$200 off any RCC kit for org members . . . :banana:

https://www.hayabusa.org/forum/threads/brake-hanger-install.153987/

Slave support is fine, you still can't pull the clutch lever in when the clutch is locked up. :banana:

You can't pull the clutch lever in when that clutch is locked. You need to put either a quick shifter or air shifter on that bike . . .

$320 + ship

Let's derail the entire thread. Giving tech advice voluntarily and freely to someone 2,000 miles away and then being accused of tailoring that advice for profit is low on your part. But you are good at that. You know damn well the King's issue is not air fuel, and that bike was not...

I disagree, you can get a much better tune through a pc on a dyno with the RIGHT tuner. Your "feeling" about how other shops might prefer one over the other because of greed and profit is low rent. My "feeling" is that you should do what you know, do what you are good at, and let that speak...

NIce

I have years of experience doing both ecu fuel tunes and fuel tunes with PCs and other platforms. Fuel tables are not the issue, the software used to interact with those tables is. If you have not done both, your opinion is useless as to which way is better and why. And stating what “most” are...

I don’t see any spacer plate between the stock cover and the motor - those lockup arms are not hitting the cover when extended?

No you didn’t. First off, it would take three times as long on the dyno - easily 6 hours - to develop a fuel tune through the ecu as opposed to maybe an hour to do a more precise and much more accurate tune using a pc. I would put one of my custom tunes up against any sh*t ecu fuel tune any...